Douglas Walter Mateyaschuk II

Douglas Walter Mateyaschuk II

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.7

Licensed for 21 years

International law Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: International Law, Litigation, Appeals

1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY

About Douglas

Biography

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

International Law 50%

Mr. Mateyaschuk specializes in complex international litigation. He has experience representing foreign financial institutions in mass tort actions, commercial disputes and regulatory matters. He has also represented foreign sovereigns.

22 years | 15 cases

50%
Appeals 25%

Mr. Mateyaschuk has handeled multi-billion dollar appeals and appeals involving significant Constitutional issues in the circuit courts of appeals and the Supreme Court of the US.

17 years | 10 cases

25%
Litigation 25%

Mr. Mateyaschuk has represented clients in breach of contract, mass tort, employment disputes, letters of credit and a host of federal, state and common law actions.

22 years | 15 cases

25%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 21 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2005

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

DLA Piper LLP (US)

1251 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY, 10020

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Douglas Walter Mateyaschuk II's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Douglas Walter Mateyaschuk II's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Douglas
Somair Syed Alam headshot
Somair Alam

Litigation lawyer | Feb 12

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. A top-notch litigation attorney. Highly respected in the legal community."

Steven Jay Young headshot
Steven Young

Litigation lawyer | Sep 22

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I very strongly endorse this lawyer. I have been privileged to work with many bright and capable attorneys, but Doug Mateyaschuk is truly outstanding. He is a brilliant lawyer. Highly motivated to win, he has both the skill and the intellect to accomplish that goal, even in the most difficult cases. He has represented, and been highly praised by, the most demanding clients, and always deservedly so."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.7 (Superb)

Honors

2020

Top Rated International Attorney, SuperLawyers

2019

Top Rated International Attorney, SuperLawyers

2018

Rising Star in International Litigation, Super Lawyers Magazine

2018

Legal Lion, Law 360

2017

Rising Star in International Litigation, Super Lawyers Magazine

2016

Rising Star in International Litigation, Super Lawyers Magazine

2015

Rising Star in International Litigation, Super Lawyers Magazine

2014

Rising Star in International Litigation, Super Lawyers Magazine

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Partner, Dla Piper, LLP (Us)

2012 - 2012

Associate, Dla Piper, LLP (Us)

2005 - 2012

Associate, Dewey & LeBoeuf LLP

2003 - 2005

Summer Associate & Associate, Winston & Strawn, LLP

2001 - 2003

Law Clerk, Arnold & Porter, LLP

Associations

2004 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

2000 - Present

Phi Beta Kappa

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Averbach v. Cairo Amman Bank, No. 19-cv-0004-GHW, 2020 WL 1130733 (S.D.N.Y. Mar. 9, 2020)

Dismissal of all claims against defendant; held: plaintiffs failed to plausibly plead elements of Anti-Terrorism Act tort. Client victory.

Averbach v. Cairo Amman Bank, No. 19-cv-0004-GHW-KHP, 2020 WL 486869 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 21, 2020)

Magistrate recommeded dismissal of all claims against defendant; held: plaintiffs failed to plausibly plead elements of Anti-Terrorism Act tort. Client victory.

Kaplan v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, SAL, 405 F. Supp. 3d 525 (S.D.N.Y. 2019)

Dismissal of all claims against defendant; held: plaintiffs failed to plausibly plead elements of Anti-Terrorism Act tort. Client victory.

Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC, 138 S. Ct. 1386 (2018)

Dismissal of plaintiffs' claims affirmed; held: foreign corporations cannot be sued under the Alien Tort Statute. Client victory.

Linde v. Arab Bank, PLC, 882 F.3d 314 (2d Cir. 2018)

Trial court judgment vacated and remanded; held: trial court committed prejudicial error in instructing the jury with regard to the elements of a civil Anti-Terrorism Act claim. Client victory.

Mohamed Fawzi v. Al Jazeera Media Network, 273 F. Supp. 3d 182 (D.D.C. 2017)

Dismissing plaintiffs' claims; held: Qatar-based media company not subject to the general or specific jurisdiction of the court. Client victory.

Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP v. Yorkville Advisors Global, LP, Index No. 655214/2016, slip op. (N.Y. Sup. Ct. May 2, 2017)

Order quashing subpoena seeking non-party documents. Client victory.

Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, Sal, 659 Fed. Appx. 13 (2d Cir. 2016)

Dismissal of plaintiffs' claims affirmed; held: the district court correctly applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel in dismissing plaintiffs' Anti-Terrorism Act claims. Client victory.

Licci v. Lebanese Canadian Bank, Sal, 834 F.3d 201 (2d Cir. 2016), cert. denied, 138 S. Ct. 1691 (2018)

Dismissal of plaintiffs' claims affirmed; held: district court did not err in concluding that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over plaintiffs' Alien Tort Statute claims. Client victory.

In Re: Arab Bank, 13-3605, NYLJ 1202757240430, at *1 (2d Cir., Decided May 9, 2016)

En banc review denied. Client victory.

In re Arab Bank, PLC Alien Tort Statute Litig., 808 F.3d 144 (2d Cir. 2015)

Dismissal of plaintiffs' claims affirmed; held: corporations are not proper defendants in suits brought pursuant to the Alien Tort Statute. Client victory.

Jesner v. Arab Bank, PLC, No. 1:06-cv-03869-BMC-VVP (E.D.N.Y.)

Dismissing plaintiffs' claims; held: corporations are not proper defendants under the Alien Tort Statute. Client victory.

Gill v. Arab Bank, PLC, 893 F. Supp. 2d 542 (E.D.N.Y. 2012)

Summary judgment granted; held: plaintiff failed to proffer sufficient evidence to support an inference that defendant is liable for his injuries. Client victory.

Tamam v. Fransabank S.A.L., 677 F. Supp. 2d 720 (S.D.N.Y. 2010)

Dismissing plaintiffs' claims; held: Lebanon-based banks not subject to the general or specific jurisdiction of the court. Client victory.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2004

Georgetown University Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

2000

Hofstra University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2016

Rise of U.S. Regulation and Litigation

Panel Discusion (Kuwait City, Kuwait)

2015

Expanding Reach of U.S. Regulation and Litigation

Panel Discussion (Dubai, U.A.E.)

2012

Recent Developments in International Litigation International Litigation

Publications

2015

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution