Patricia Ann Fersch

PRO

Patricia Ann Fersch

4.3
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 31 years

Family Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Family, Divorce & Separation, Child Custody ... +2 more

11 Broadway Ste 550, New York, NY

Virtual Consultation Available

About Patricia

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Family 40%

divorce, prenuptuals, orders of protection, child custody, child support, family law, separation agreements, post nuptial agreements, marital agreements, parenting time, etc.

32 years | 3,000 cases

40%
Child Custody 15%

15%
Child Support 15%

15%
Divorce and Separation 15%

15%
Marriage and Prenuptials 15%

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2019

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 31 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1994

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Fersch LLC

11 Broadway Ste 550, New York, NY, 10004-1382

pffamilylaw.com

Patricia Ann Fersch's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.3 /5.0

18 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (18) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 16 - 18 of 18 reviews

Posted by anonymous | April 03, 2026

Partially Incorrect Advice — Not Recommended

I consulted Ms. Fersch regarding a New York divorce case involving significant financial disparity between spouses and a DRL §237 counsel fee motion strategy. Her response was dismissive and partially inaccurate. She incorrectly framed the relevance of my spouse's trust fund income — confusing ass...et ownership with income available for support, which are two very different legal concepts. Trust fund income is absolutely relevant to spousal support calculations and counsel fee motions under DRL §237, regardless of whether the non-monied spouse has any ownership claim to the trust itself. She did not engage seriously with the specifics of my case and provided a generic response that did not reflect a careful reading of the facts presented. For a case of this complexity, I expected more depth and precision. I would not recommend her for complex matrimonial matters.

Posted by anonymous | May 08, 2017 | Hired Attorney

review

I used this attorney for my divorce. She has a strong reputation and seemed caring when I met her. But over time I saw that she was forgetful and that her writing was sloppy and incoherent. Some of the legal advice she gave me was flat out wrong. She was confused regarding numbers and her hands ...would shake in court. I have a bad feeling that she is aging and not able to stay on top of her cases anymore. She made some critical mistakes due to wrong legal advice in my case and I will pay for it for years to come. In my opinion she is getting by under the radar because of her reputation but needs to have her memory tested, or retire. She means well but legal situations are high stakes and she did not (could not) do right by me and my kids.

Posted by anonymous | October 07, 2009

Avoid - especially if you are a man

Patricia was positive about my divorce case until she collected my retainer. Then she tried to brow beat me to settle for alimony and support payments upon which I would have defaulted in one month's time. Further, if my circumstances changed (layoff, reduced bonus) I knew I'd be in serious trouble... if I agree to these terms for which she was pushing. Agreements can only be altered by a court if a change in circumstances is foreseeable -- layoffs, etc. are foreseeable. Essentially, if I followed her advice, I would have found myself defending against repeated attacks by my ex-wife to throw me in jail for contempt in not being able to make those payments. Her response to my criticism was that the courts did not care about fathers and would actually prefer to see me living out of a cardboard box in the bronx. she was supposed to be my advocate. she made one appearance for a status conference on my case. I had previously file a downward motionas my interim payments exceeded my income. She silently stood at attention, not saying a word, as the other side berated me in front of the judgte for not making my support and alimony payments in full. She offered not one word of support -- such as thee payments exceed his income. He's trying everything, he's paying what he can on credit card checks, we are wiating to hear on our downward motion. The judge was not pleased. i fired her immediately. i would not recoomend that any man hire her -- in my opinion i think she is prejudiced against men.

See All Client Reviews

Patricia Ann Fersch's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Patricia
Maxine Fay Donskoi headshot
Maxine Donskoi

Family lawyer | Nov 20

Relationship: Co-worker

"I endorse Patricia Fersch without any hesitation. She is an excellent mentor and advocate. Pat is extremely talented at what she does and works hard for her clients."

Ilysa Marlene Magnus headshot
Ilysa Magnus

Family lawyer | Nov 20

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I have know Pat for many years. She is a zealous advocate for her clients and an extremely talented family lawyer.... I highly recommend her"

Ingrid Gherman headshot
Ingrid Gherman

Family lawyer | Nov 28

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"I endorse this lawyer. I highly respect Patricia's work in family law."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2019

Service Award, Family Kind

2019

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2018

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2017

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2016

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2015

Hanna S. Cohn Pro Bono Award, Women's Bar Association

2014

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2010

Partner in Justice Award, MFY Legal Services

2006

Pro Bono Partner in Justice Award, MFY Legal Services

2002

Public Interest Coalition Award, New York Law School

Work Experience

1994 - Present

Founder, Fersch LLC

Associations

2019 - Present

Family Kind

Board of Directors

2019 - Present

Community Word

Board of Directors

2011 - Present

New York Women's Bar Association Matrimonial Pro Bono Project

Co-Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

Vikram J. v. Anupama S., 123 A.D.3d 625 (App Div 1st Dept. 2014)

Appellant-Respondent prevailed. Hague Civil service convention trumped New York CPLR.

Ponorovskaya v. Stecklow, 45 Misc. 3d 597 (N.Y. Cty. Sup. Ct., Cooper, J. 2014)

It was not considered to be a valid marriage. No marriage was deemed to have taken place.

In re Penny B. v. Gary S., 61 A.D.3d 589 (App Div 1st Dept. 2009)

Legal and physical custody to the Father

In the Matter of Lisa W. v. Seine W., 2005 NY Slip Op 51782U (Kings Cty. Fam. Ct., Olshansky, J. 2005)

Hearsay testimony in a forensic report can not come into evidence without testimony of the witnesses.

Chu v. Lin, N.Y.L.J, May 29, 2020 (Sup. Ct. N.Y. Cnty 2020)

Matter of David S. v. Samantha G., 59 Misc.3d 960, 74 N.Y.S.3d 730 (Fam. Ct., New York County 2018).

Client (the father's husband) has standing to seek custody and visitation.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1992

New York Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1988

New York University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution