Steven B. Pokotilow

Steven B. Pokotilow

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review

Licensed for 52 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at New York, NY
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property

180 Maiden Lane Floor 17, New York, NY

Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About Steven

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in New York for 52 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1974

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Stroock & Stroock & Lavan

180 Maiden Lane Floor 17, New York, NY, 10038

Steven B Pokotilow,Esq

2 Claridge Dr Apt 3 Dw, Verona, NJ, 07044-5007

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Steven B. Pokotilow's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Steven B. Pokotilow's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Steven

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Associations

American Bar Association

Member

Education

1986

University of Maryland, College Park

BS - Bachelor of Science

1973

American University, Washington College of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

N/A

Washington College

Speaking Engagements

2003

ALI-ABA

Latest Developments in Complex Civil Litigation: An Analysis of the Federal Judicial Center’s New Manual for Complex Litigation, Fourth

2002

Annual Conference for the Society for Biomolecular Screening

Intellectual Property and the Business Deal: What You Need to Know

2001

Trademark Association Annual Meeting

Are Fame and Distinctiveness the Same Under the FTDA?” and “Have the Tests for Dilution and Infringement Effectively Merged in Some Circuits

2000

Practising Law Institute

Dilution: The Split in the Circuits

2000

New York State Bar Association

Intellectual Property in Healthcare Information Technologies

2000

Intellectual Property Owners Association

Federal Trademark Dilution Law After Five Years

2000

ABA Section on Intellectual Property & Law

Dilution at the Millennium: An Evaluation

1999

Practising Law Institute

Advanced Seminar of Trademark Law: Update on Dilution

1999

Practising Law Institute

Patent Litigation: Effective Closing Arguments

1999

Colorado Bar Association

How to Prove a Case Under the Anti-Dilution Laws

1999

AIPLA Annual Conference

A Case Study on the Ringling Bros. v. Utah Decision

1999

ABA Section on Intellectual Property & Law

The Federal Anti-Dilution Act: The First Three Years

1998

Trade Secret Conference

Considerations in Conducting Exit Interviews When Disclosure of Proprietary Information May Be at Risk

1998

INTA Dilution and Famous Marks Forum

Diluting the Dilution Act: Analysis of the First Two Years of Litigation

1997

Practising Law Institute

Presentation of Model Opening and Closing Statements to Juries in Patent Trials

1997

International Trademark Association Annual Meeting

Dilution of Famous Marks Under United States Law

1996

Practising Law Institute

Presentation of Model Opening and Closing Statements to Juries in Patent Trials

1995

International Trademark Association Forum

The Relationship Between Trademarks and Labels Under the Lanham Act and Alcoholic Beverage and Tobacco Laws

1995

International Technology Transfer Conference

Identifying the Important Issues When Licensing Transferred Technology in Eastern and Central Europe

Publications

2005

The Practical Litigator Internet Pop-Up Advertise-ments: Do They Infringe?

2004

LabToWallStreet Identification of Intellectual Property Due Diligence Pitfalls in Cross-Border Transactions

2004

Patent Strategy & Management File early and File Often: A Pending Application is Your Best Approach to Capturing Your Competitor’s Product

2003

Screening: Trends in Drug Discovery U.S. Patent Protection for European Inventions: Global Strategies for a Global Marketplace

2003

INTA Trademark Dilution Forum Are Descriptive Marks That Have Acquired Distinctiveness Protected Under the FTDA?

2002

Journal of BioMolecular Screening Collaborating with Academia: What You Need to Know

2001

Trademark Reporter FTDA Survey Evidence: Does Existing Case Law Provide Any Guidance for Constructing a Survey?

2001

Annual INTA Spring Forum The Use of Surveys to Resolve Fame and/or Dilution Issues Under the Federal Trademark Dilution Act

2000

American Bar Association publication Does the Federal Trademark Dilution Act Apply to Trade Dress?

2000

New York State Bar Association Intellectual Property in Healthcare Information Technologies

2000

New York State Bar Association Creating and Protecting Rights

2000

The Intellectual Property Strategist Inequitable Conduct as an Infringement Defense

2000

U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Left Lane Ends, Merge Ahead: Is Federal Dilution Protection Available Against Non-Competing Goods?

2000

Intellectual Property Owners Association Annual Conference on Patent and Trademark Office Law and Practice Left Lane Ends, Merge Ahead: Is Federal Dilution Protection Available Against Non-Competing Goods?

2000

AIPLA 23rd Annual Conference Is Fame Synonymous with Distinctiveness Under the Anti-Dilution Statute?

1999

The Intellectual Property Strategist Utilitarian Objects: Why the Sum Is Less Than the Parts

1999

The Intellectual Property Strategist New Risk to Intellectual Property: Can States Infringe with Impunity?

1999

The Intellectual Property Strategist New Legislation Likely: Are States Now Immune from Infringement Suits?

1999

American Bar Association publication Applying the Federal Dilution Act to Identical or Substantially Similar Marks on Unrelated Goods

1999

New York Law Journal Whittling Away at Dilution
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution