John R Williams

John R Williams

2.3
Rating: 4.9

Licensed for 58 years

Criminal defense Lawyer at New Haven, CT
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Civil Rights, Appeals, Employment & Labor

51 Elm St Ste 409, New Haven, CT

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019
See Details

About John

Biography

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 500-600 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Connecticut for 58 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 1968

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2019

Location

John R Williams and Associates, LLC

51 Elm St Ste 409, New Haven, CT, 06510-2049

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John R Williams's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

2.3 /5.0

12 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (12) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 4 of 4 reviews | 5 stars

Posted by Sophie | June 01, 2022 | Discrimination

Helped me without any reason in the world.

My husband was being railroaded in a 3 year long neglected CHRO employment discrimination case. I called around and Mr. Williams was one of few willing to speak to me over the phone without any payment. He continued to look over the case and answered my questions via email. He agreed to take the case... for a fee but admitted to me that staying with the CHRO was probably the best option at this time due to the state filing statue of limitations and federal being the only option left, he could've taken my money and ran with it. Even informing me that the CHRO mediators are not attorneys and don't always give the correct information was so vital, I can't even express how important that one comment was as it forced me to look into everything my husband was being told by the CHRO and found countless mistakes that we were able to fight against and ultimately settled the case on our own for 8 times the amount that was originally offered. I very much appreciate all the time and honesty of attorney John Williams, he went above and beyond and for no reason at all other than pure kindness and it really means so much to me. Thank you Sir

Posted by Kwasi | March 05, 2020 | Hired Attorney | Lawsuits & Disputes

A Blessing

John saved my case ( had 3 lawyer's before him ) John saved my faith ( when you have no earthly hope and God sends you a lawyer you begin to see how strong faith and belief are) John saved my family ( we were financially strapped and physically separated due to the nature of the case, but John neve...r lost his composure or compassion) Overall, as a man of Christ I thank my Lord and Savior first and foremost. He took John someone who was least likely to me and made the greatest impact.

Posted by Sean | February 27, 2019

Highly Recommended

John R. Williams & Associates is the firm to choose if you need effective representation. Mr. Williams personally oversees your case and he and his associates will work very hard on your behalf. His rates are reasonable and once he is retained you do not have to worry about anything. I would highl...y recommend this firm to anyone who needs a law firm to advocate on their behalf.

Posted by anonymous | October 07, 2015 | Hired Attorney | Civil Rights

John Williams Saved My Case

I am currently represented by John Williams in a federal civil rights case regarding an employment matter. I had been handling the case myself at the CHRO level and made an error and was in over my head. I thought my case was dead. I was referred to John. At our first meeting, he told be that in...deed, I had made an error. I stood up to leave and he informed me that there was another way. Thanks to John, my case is still alive, has survived a dismissal effort, and has moved into the discovery phase. I believe that the case will continue to move along. I could not be happier and more impressed with John Williams. He is patient and answers questions in a thoughtful manner. He has many years of experience and a wealth of knowledge. I highly recommend him.

See All Client Reviews

John R Williams's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  4.9 (Concern)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019.

Reprimand issued in CT, 2019

updated on 08/19/2019

A reprimand is an order from the Statewide Grievance Committee after it has found that an attorney has engaged in ethical misconduct. If an attorney receives more than 3 reprimands in 5 years, a presentment must be filed against the attorney so the Superior Court can decide if more serious discipline should be ordered.

Suspension issued in CT, 2017

updated on 11/28/2017

This means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Honors

2018

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Work Experience

1980 - 1990

Adjunct Faculty, Yale Law School

Associations

National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Life Member

Connecticut Criminal Defense Lawyers Association

Founding Member

1997 - 1998

Association of Trial Lawyers of America

Chair, Civil Rights Section

Sample of Legal Cases

Drimal v. Tai, 786 F.3d 219 (2d Cir. 2015)

Suit for unlawful wiretapping by FBI agents remanded for trial.

Sousa v. Roque, 578 F.3d 164 (2d Cir. 2009)

Plaintiff prevailed.

Bhatia v. Debek, 287 Conn. 397, 948 A.2d 1009 (2008)

Plaintiff prevailed.

Lopes v. Farmer, 286 Conn. 384, 944 A.2d 921 (2008)

Plaintiff prevailed.

Doe ex rel. A.N. v. East Haven Board of Education, 430 F. Supp. 2d 54 (D. Conn.), aff'd 200 Fed. Appx. 46 (2d Cir. 2006)

Plaintiff prevailed.

DeLeo v. Nusbaum, 263 Conn. 588, 821 A.2d 744 (2003)

Plaintiff prevailed

Porter v. Nussle, 534 U.S. 516 (2002)

Second Circuit ruling reversed

Zavatsky v. Anderson, 130 F. Supp. 2d 349 (D. Conn. 2001)

Plaintiff prevailed.

State v. DeAngelo, 2000 WL 973104 (Conn. Super. 2000)

Defendant acquitted on grounds of ingestion of prescription medication.

Bell v. Board of Education, 55 Conn. App. 400, 739 A.2d 321 (1999)

Plaintiffs prevailed.1

Drumm v. Brown, 245 Conn. 657, 716 A.2d 50 (1998)

Plaintiff prevailed.

Delahunty v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Ins. Co., 236 Conn. 582, 674 A.2d 1290 (1996)

Plaintiff prevailed.

DeLaurentis v. City of New Haven, 220 Conn. 225, 597 A.2d 807 (1991)

Plaintiff prevailed.

Ruggiero v. Krzeminski, 928 F.2d 558 (2d Cir. 1991)

Plaintiff prevailed

Dobosz v. Walsh, 892 F.2d 1135 (2d Cir. 1989)

Substantial damages award to plaintiff affirmed.

Miller v. Angliker, 848 F.2d 1312 (2d Cir. 1988)

Prisoner released from custody.

Haskins v. Manson, 791 F.2d 255 (2d Cir. 1986)

Conviction vacated.

Gagnon v. Ball, 696 F.2d 17 (2d Cir. 1982)

Plaintiff prevailed

See More Legal Cases

Education

1967

Georgetown University Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

1963

Harvard College

A.B.

Publications

2003

Suffolk Journal of Trial & Appellate Advocacy Beyone Police Misconduct and False Arrest: Expanding the Scope of 42 USC 1983 Litigation

1996

Convicting the Innocent The Ben Miller Frame-Up

1988

Civil Rights Litigation and Attorney Fees A Practitioner's Guide to Representing Plaintiffs in Section 1983 Litigation

1968

Languages

English

Spanish

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2019
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution