Colin Patrick Mahon

PRO

Colin Patrick Mahon

4.6
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 20 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Meriden, CT
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Workers Compensation, Landlord & Tenant, Litigation

636 Broad Street, P.O. Box 2420, Meriden, CT

Free Consultation

About Colin

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Personal Injury 40%

I represent individuals who have been injured due to someone else's fault. My personal injury practice includes premises liability claims, dog bites, slip and falls, products liability, motor vehicle accidents, assaults and batteries, and nuisance claims. I routinely litigate matters in the Connecticut state court system and I have also participated in numerous mediation and arbitration proceedings. I am a member of the Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association.

19 years

40%
Workers Compensation 40%

I represent workers who have been injured on the job as a result of a traumatic event, repetitive trauma, or occupational disease. I regularly appear before the Connecticut Workers' Compensation Commission. I have been involved in all aspects of workers' compensation litigation, including representation at informal hearings, formal hearings, and the Compensation Review Board. I sit on the Workers' Compensation section of the Connecticut bar and I edit and write for "Compensation Quarterly."

19 years

40%
Landlord or Tenant 10%

I represent landlords and tenants who are dealing with issues related to rental properties. I often represent mobile manufactured home parks in rental disputes with park residents.

19 years

10%
Litigation 10%

I routinely handle civil cases, including civil appeals. I have briefed several cases before the Connecticut appellate courts and the Workers' Compensation Review Board.

21 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 120 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 225-325 per hour

Contingency

20%-33%


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Awards

Client's Choice
Client's Choice
2014

Licenses

Licensed in Connecticut for 20 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 2005

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Mahon, Quinn & Mahon, P.C.

636 Broad Street, P.O. Box 2420, Meriden, CT, 06450

mqmlawyer.com/Attorneys/colin-p-mahon

Online Presence

Other places you can find Colin online.

Colin Patrick Mahon's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.6 /5.0

11 Client Reviews

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | General Knowledge

Posted by anonymous | September 15, 2014 | Personal Injury

Personal Injury / House Closing

In 2012 we had Colin handle a personal injury case. Throughout the process Colin kept us updated on the progress of the case, was easily accessible (promptly returned phone calls and/or emails), and answered all of our questions in layman’s terms. It was clear that Colin genuinely cared and sympathi...zed with our situation. The office has a welcoming family atmosphere rather than a large firm, so you truly aren’t just a number. In 2013 we had Colin handle the closing on our new house and there were several issues that had come up (e.g., a lien on the property) in addition, there was an issue with the mortgage company not being ready to close when we needed to move. Colin quickly put together a ‘hold harmless agreement’ that would allow us to essentially rent our home until the closing went through a week later. Through this stressful time, Colin kept us informed, updated, and reassured that everything would work out. He is everything one would want in a lawyer (hardworking, detail oriented, caring, and honest).

Posted by anonymous | July 31, 2024 | Landlord & Tenant

Please read. Do not recommend

If I could give zero stars I would! I received a frivolous, baseless and retaliatory "NOTICE TO QUIT" from Colin. He insisted that I vacate the premise by August 31st. Why? He claimed that I have failed to agree to a proposed rent increase which simply was not true. And falsely claimed that I have on...ly been paying the prior rental rate of $425 when in fact the prior rental for lot rent I have in fact been paying has been $420 from Jan 2023 through December 2023. Not the $425 as he falsely claimed. I feel he falsified legal documents and willfully fabricated all of this just to give the illusion that I have not agreed to a rent increase when in fact I have. Claiming I have ONLY been paying the prior rental of $425 when in fact the prior rental I have paid was $420 gives that illusion. His client wanted to raise me to $441. But also offered to work out a rent solution to anyone having difficulties keeping up with the lot rent. I previously reached out to his client 3 times to work out a solution and his client ignored me. So I made a very good faith effort to pay an increase and sent in an extra $5.00 per month over the previous year which was the per-pandemic rental increase. His client made zero effort to work out the solution he originally offered to make. And 7 months, he decides he is unhappy with the increase I am paying him? There simply is no justification to send a "NOTICE TO QUIT" over this. I feel this is simply a “Smoke and mirrors” tactic by him to try and have me evicted under false pretenses. Claiming I am ONLY paying the prior rental rate when in fact I have been paying more. And he knows this. The “NOTICE TO QUIT” in Connecticut should not include the names of minor children. This is because the law prohibits landlords from serving a notice to quit on a minor under 18. His client was very well aware that I have a minor child. An innocent, sweet, loving, caring 10 year old autistic child. And to make matters worse, he decided to hit below the belt and include his full name in this eviction. I believe this was done solely and purposely for no reason other than to harass, intimidate and attack my child. And to add insult to injury, he even highlighted my minor child’s name! As an Attorney, he should know children are off limits! And to leave the children out of this and leave them alone! This “NOTICE TO QUITE” I truly believe was based solely on retaliation and revenge for taking his client to court prior in which his client lost the case. Colin was not the attorney on the case at that time but he works close with his client. This was inexcusable. My child is only 10! This will result in legal action against him, possibly for many years to come. For starters, I will file a grievance complaint. I DO NOT recommend this attorney to anyone.

See All Client Reviews

Colin Patrick Mahon's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Colin

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2021

Super Lawyer, Super Lawyers

2020

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2019

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2018

Rising Star, SuperLawyers

2017

Rising Star -- Personal Injury/Plaintiff, SuperLawyers

2017

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2016

Rotarian of the Year, The Rotary Club of Meriden, Inc.

2016

Rising Star -- Personal Injury/Plaintiff, SuperLawyers

2016

Board Certified Workers' Compensation Specialist, Connecticut Bar Association

2016

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2015

Rising Star -- Personal Injury/Plaintiff, SuperLawyers

2015

New Leaders of the Law, Connecticut Law Tribune

2015

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2014

Rising Star -- Personal Injury/Plaintiff, SuperLawyers

2014

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2010

Achievement Award, Connecticut Bar Association, Young Lawyers Section

2005

Outstanding Achievement: Real Estate Transactions, Quinnipiac University School of Law

2003

Outstanding Achievement: Contracts, Quinnipiac University School of Law

2003

Outstanding Achievement: Legal Skills II, Quinnipiac University School of Law

2002

Outstanding Achievement: Legal Skills I, Quinnipiac University School of Law

Work Experience

2010 - Present

Partner, Mahon, Quinn & Mahon, PC

2008 - 2009

Associate, Weigand, Mahon & Adelman, PC

2005 - 2007

Associate, Pepe & Hazard, LLP

2004 - 2004

Judicial Intern, Hon. Janet Bond Arterton (US District Court for the District of Connecticut)

2003 - 2003

Summer Associate, Northeast Utilities Corp.

Associations

2018 - Present

Connecticut Statewide Grievance Committee

Member

2015 - Present

The Meriden Foundation

Distribution Committee Chairperson

2014 - Present

Workers' Compensation Executive Committee, Connecticut Bar Association

Executive Committee Member

2009 - Present

Rotary Club of Meriden

Member, Board Member, Club Director, President (2019-2020)

2008 - Present

Connecticut Trial Lawyers Association

Member

2012 - 2018

Boys and Girls Club of Meriden, Inc.

Board Member & Secretary

2012 - 2019

Compensation Quarterly (Connecticut Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section)

Editor & Contributing Author

2011 - 2016

National Organization of Social Security Claimants Representatives

Member

2009 - 2010

Connecticut Bar Association

Young Lawyers Workers' Compensation Co-Chair

2006 - 2007

Connecticut Bar Association

Young Lawyers Litigation Co-Chair

Sample of Legal Cases

Colonial Investors, LLC v. Lois Furbush

Judgment of Possession Affirmed

Kenosia Commons, Inc. v. DaCosta

Trial court decision reversed and case remanded for further proceedings.

Longview Estates, LLC. v. Woodin

Judgment of the trial court affirmed.

Fairchild Heights Resident's Association v. Fairchild Heights, Inc.,

The plaintiff withdrew its action against the defendant.

Fairchild Heights, Inc. v. Dickal

The judgment of possession was upheld by the Connecticut Supreme Court.

Sunset Gold Realty, Inc. v. Premier Building & Development, Inc.

Judgment in favor of the plaintiff upheld by the Connecticut Appellate Court

Stewart v. Biernard et al.

The case resolved favorably for the plaintiff after a mediation.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2005

Quinnipiac University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor (Summa Cum Laude)

2002

College of the Holy Cross

BA - Bachelor of Arts (Cum Laude)

Speaking Engagements

2019

Game of Bones: The Science and Strategy of Orthopedic Claims

Legal and Medical Ethics

Publications

2018

Compensation Quarterly (Connecticut Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section) Case Comments

2015

Compensation Quarterly (Connecticut Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section) Case Comments

2014

Compensation Quarterly (Connecticut Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section) Case Comments

2013

Compensation Quarterly (Connecticut Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section) Case Comments

2011

Compensation Quarterly (Connecticut Bar Association, Workers' Compensation Section) Owner-Controlled and Contractor-Controlled Insurance Programs: An Overview of Wrap-Up Insurance and its Implications on the Connecticut Workers' Compensation Act

2007

Hartford Business Journal Getting Off the Hook

2007

Connecticut Law Tribune Irreperable Harm: Dead-Letter or Equitable Mainstay?

2006

Connecticut Business Journal The Advantages of ADR

2004

The Law Review Association of Quinnipiac University School of Law Simmons v. Roper: Trying to Strike the Balance Between Strictly Obeying Supreme Court Precedent and Overruling Outmoded Concepts of Capital Punishment

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution