No Photo

T David Bomzer

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 6.9

Licensed for 25 years

Patent application Lawyer at Hartford, CT
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Litigation

151 Farmington Ave, Re6 A, Hartford, CT

About T

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Connecticut for 13 years

State: Connecticut

Acquired: 2012

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 25 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2001

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Aetna

151 Farmington Ave, Re6 A, Hartford, CT, 06156-0001

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

T David Bomzer's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

T David Bomzer's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse T
Mark Elliot Korn headshot
Mark Korn

Litigation lawyer | Nov 17

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"David was arguably the only better appellate advocate to graduate from the same class in law school. His intelligence and passion for his clients make home a formidable force as a litigator. I endorse David without hesitation or reservation."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.9 (Good)

Education

2006

Polytechnic University

MS - Master of Science

2006

Polytechnic University

2000

Yeshiva University, Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1994

State University of New York at Buffalo

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

2004

NYCLA, Brief for Amicus Curiae Response to Proposed Changes in Federal Rules Requiring CLE/Retesting of Patent Attorneys

2003

Brief for Amicus Curiae Support For Neither Party, Knorr-Bremse Systeme Fuer Nutzfahzeuge GMBH v. Dana Corporation

2000

Unknown Litigating Trademark, Trade Dress, and Unfair Competition Cases: A Defendant's Memorandum of Law

1999

New York Law Journal Inadvertent Disclosure of Privileged Information
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution