Lexington, MA
Criminal defense Lawyer at Lexington, MA
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Personal Injury, Child Custody
OUTCOME: Charges dismissed after filing motion to suppress evidence challenging the legality of the search and seizure.
Defendant charged with possession of over 1 ounce of marijuana, possession with the intent to distribute, and possession of steroids after his vehicle was stopped by police.
OUTCOME: All charges to be dismissed after 1 year without the Client making any admission to any criminal act.
2 Counts of Assault and Battery on a Household Member and 2 Counts of Assault and Battery.
OUTCOME: Judgment Awarding Father Joint Legal Custody of two children.
Complaint for Modification for Father to regain joint legal custody after losing legal custody of his two children because the Father was incarcerated.
OUTCOME: Dismissed prior to Arraignment.
Client charged with tampering with license plate to conceal identity and operating unregistered motor vehicle.
OUTCOME: Joint Legal Custody of Minor Children Awarded to Father.
On behalf of Father of two minor children, Father was awarded Joint Legal Custody of the minor children when Father's legal custody was previously lost due to being incarcerated.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Represented a Defendant opposing the extension of a 209A Restraining Order. After an evidentiary hearing, the court denied the Restraining Order on the grounds that as a matter of law, the allegations ... did not amount to abuse as defined under G.L. c. 209A
OUTCOME: Judgment for Plaintiff in the Amount of $56,500.00
Obtained a Judgment out of Superior Court for $56,500.00 on a complaint for damages for breach of a quasi contract and unjust enrichment.
OUTCOME: Judgment for Plaintiff in the amount of $8,750.00 plus costs and interests.
Complaint for damages for breach of contract, breach of implied warranty of merchantability, and violation of the consumer protection statue relating to the sale of an automobile.
OUTCOME: Charges of violating restraining order were dismissed prior to Defendant's arraignment.
Defendant accused of violating a 209A Restraining Order. The court ruled in favor of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and the charges where dismissed prior to Defendant's arraignment.
OUTCOME: Restraining Order Denied
Represented Defendant who opposed a 209A Restraining Order that was dismissed after the court found the Plaintiff failed to demonstrate they were reasonably in imminent fear of suffering an substantial ... bodily harm
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
