Ilana M. Quirk

Ilana M. Quirk

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.0

Licensed for 42 years

Land use and zoning Lawyer at Boston, MA
Practice Areas: Land Use & Zoning, General Practice, Real Estate

101 Arch Street, Boston, MA

About Ilana

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Massachusetts for 42 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 1983

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Kopelman and Paige, P.C.

101 Arch Street, Boston, MA, 02110-1109

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Ilana M. Quirk's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Ilana M. Quirk's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Ilana

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.0 (Very Good)

Work Experience

2006 - Present

Principal Attorney, Kopelman and Paige, P.C.

2003 - 2006

Planner, Town of Norwell

1994 - 2003

Attorney, Kopelman and Paige, P.C.

1987 - 1994

Legal Counsel, Massachusetts State Senate

1983 - 1987

Associate, Barron & Stadfeld, PC

Associations

2004 - Present

Norwell Visiting Nurse Association

Board of Directors

1984 - Present

Massachusetts Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

McCain v. Conservation Commission of Wareham, 76 Mass. App. Ct. 1119 (2010)

Commission's denial of order of conditions successfully upheld.

Morgan v. Jozus, et al., 74 Mass. App. Ct. 1115 (2009)

Municipal decisions successfully affirmed.

Cornell v. Board of Appeals of Dracut, 453 Mass. 888 (2009)

Provided persuasive amicus brief.

Historic District Commission of Chelmsford v. Kalos, 48 Mass. App. Ct. 919 (2000)

Affirmed Historic District Commission's order and obtained and defended permanent injuntive relief.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1983

Suffolk University Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

Speaking Engagements

2012

Webinar

Massachusetts Gaming Act

2012

Plymouth Board of Appeals and Planning Board Workshop

Writing Defendable Landuse Decisions

2012

Massachusetts Association of Planning Directors Annual Conference

Annual Litigation Update

2011

Nantucket Workshop

Stretch Energy Code

2011

Massachusetts Association of Planning Directors Annual Conference

Annual Litigation Update

2010

South Eastern Building Officials Association Annual Conference

Frequently Asked Questions (Building Officials)

2010

Massachusetts Association of Planning Directors Annual Conference

Annual Litigation Update

2009

Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc.

Litigating Real Estate Disputes

2008

Massachusetts Continuing Legal Education, Inc.

Litigating Real Estate Disputes

Languages

German

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution