Kevin C Cain

Kevin C Cain

3.0
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 38 years

Litigation Lawyer at Canton, MA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Aviation, Intellectual Property ... +4 more

960 Turnpike Street, Suite 3C, Canton, MA

About Kevin

Biography

Practice Areas

7

Practice Areas

Litigation 65%

38 years

65%
Aviation 15%

38 years

15%
Insurance 5%

38 years

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Rhode Island for 37 years

State: Rhode Island

Acquired: 1988

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Massachusetts for 38 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 1987

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in California for 27 years

State: California

Acquired: 1998

Not Eligible to Practice Law (Not Entitled)

No misconduct found

Location

Sulloway & Hollis, P.L.L.C.

960 Turnpike Street, Suite 3C, Canton, MA, 02021

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kevin C Cain's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Posted by LS | April 14, 2017 | Hired Attorney | Real Estate

Looks for another lawyer..:

Kevin was working on a condo issue with us. His initial response was slow to start followed by 3 letters to our condo associate, followed by a $2500 bill and then nothing. After paying we never heard from Kevin again. He will waste your time and your money - don't bother.

Kevin Cain

Replied last April 14, 2017

I am surprised and personally disappointed by this review as it does not accurately reflect the nature or scope of my representation. I am also disappointed insofar as the clients failed to follow the dispute resolution process set forth in the engagement letter which they both signed. The reviewer and his partner, co-owners of a condominium unit in a two unit condominium building, retained me to assist them with resolving a number of issues they had with the owner of the second unit. Both clients seemed to be very nice people. They signed a retainer agreement on or about July 1, 2015. I was provided with portions of the condominium documents to review. I carefully reviewed the title available online and downloaded full copies of the relevant documents from the registry of deeds website. I reviewed and analyzed the relevant documents consisting of approximately 50 pages of the master deed, trust, and bylaws. I also reviewed the relevant statutory provisions and recent case law regarding resolution of deadlocks and enforcement of condominium rules and bylaws. I then had several email exchanges and phone calls with the clients and outlined a course of action.. On or about July 15, 2015 I sent the clients a draft version of a three page demand letter for their review and comments. That letter, ultimately sent to the other unit owner, provided the other unit with an analysis of the condominium documents and the alleged violations. With the clients edits included, the initial demand letter was sent to the other condominium owner on July 24, 2015. A subsequent four page demand letter and notice of annual meeting was sent on August 13, 2015 and instructions were sent to the clients regarding what to do if the other unit owner failed to appear for the meeting. Notices were sent to the other unit owner and I communicated multiple times with the other unit owner in an effort to initiate meaningful settlement discussions. I recorded each of the individual tasks I performed which were itemized on the bill. Pursuant to the terms of the engagement letter, if the client had any issues with the bill the clients had the right to initiate a dispute resolution process, including arbitration. The clients never complained to me about the amount of the bill or any of the time entries until this review was published almost a year after the representation ended. Nether client initiated the dispute resolution process or even called me to complain about any aspect of my representation. Initially both clients were fully engaged and each was involved in choosing between various alternative strategies which might lead to a resolution of the underlying dispute. The clients' numerous emails to me throughout the process confirmed that they received timely status reports and that they assented to each step taken in an effort to amicably resolve the dispute. The clients refused to authorize me to initiate litigation. Each client was provided with my email, direct line number and personal cell phone number. My efforts to initiate meaningful settlement negotiations with the other unit owner were thwarted by the other unit owner's unwillingness to participate in the process. I thoroughly discussed the litigation option with the clients and provided them with a realistic budget. The clients elected not to authorize me to pursue litigation. Therefore, my engagement was at an end unless and until the clients directed me to move forward with the filing of an equity action to enforce the terms of the condominium master deed, trust, and bylaws. Despite this review I have reiterated in writing to both clients that I am willing to pursue litigation on their behalf. The clients have failed to respond.

Posted by Mary V. | April 14, 2017 | Hired Attorney

Exceptional Legal Advice and Counsel

Over the past decade Kevin has assisted me with a number of legal matters in multiple jurisdictions. I have seen him in action and have been able to compare him to other lawyers. He deserves the highest rating possible. I value his counsel and he is my first call for all things legal. In every e...ngagement Kevin has acted in a professional manner and he has always worked diligently to achieve the best possible outcome. Kevin communicates well and he is always prompt in returning calls and emails. When faced with an emergency he is the guy to call as he will drop everything for a client who is truly in need. He is also reachable at any time and you will find that his email signature line includes his email address, direct dial number, and his personal cell number so if you have to reach him at night or on the weekends you can

See All Client Reviews

Kevin C Cain's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kevin
Michael P Doherty headshot
Michael Doherty

Litigation lawyer | Apr 01

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Kevin works hard and cares about his clietns. Kevin is a smart lawyer who finds the best result possible for his clients."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

1998

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

Education

1987

Boston College Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1984

Boston College

BS - Bachelor of Science

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution