married 22 years. I make $140,000, she makes $47,000 both of us work fulltime. Me for 29 years, her for 10. Have about 1.5 million in equity. 645,000 in my 401k. I have worked at boeing 29 years, we have been married 22 years, kids are in coll...
You make approximately $11,666 per month, gross. Your wife makes just under $4,000 per month. You have a long-term marriage. It is likely you will be required to pay spousal maintenance.
If you pay $36,000 per year to her, you'll have $104,000 gross income. She'll have $83,000 gross income. While the dissolution is pending, she may argue that you should each have an equal share of the total income. Your combined income is $187,000. Half of that is $93,500. You'd need to pay her $46,500 per year to equalize incomes (or $3,875 per month). You may argue that your post-separation income should be considered your separate property and spousal maintenance should be based on need and ability to pay.
I recommend you look at the statute to gather your best arguments to establish an appropriate amount for maintenance.
The statute is found at:
The factors are listed at the end of my response.
With regard to property, the court will first consider dividing the community portion of the equity and pension on a 50/50 basis. Whether the court decides to award a disproportionate share of the property depends on many factors. I recommend you look at the statute that directs the court as to which factors to consider. That statute is found at http://app.leg.wa.gov/Rcw/default.aspx?cite=26.09.080. The factors are also summarized at the bottom of this answer.
(a) The financial resources of the party seeking maintenance, including separate or community property apportioned to him or her, and his or her ability to meet his or her needs independently, including the extent to which a provision for support of a child living with the party includes a sum for that party;
(b) The time necessary to acquire sufficient education or training to enable the party seeking maintenance to find employment appropriate to his or her skill, interests, style of life, and other attendant circumstances;
(c) The standard of living established during the marriage or domestic partnership;
(d) The duration of the marriage or domestic partnership;
(e) The age, physical and emotional condition, and financial obligations of the spouse or domestic partner seeking maintenance; and
(f) The ability of the spouse or domestic partner from whom maintenance is sought to meet his or her needs and financial obligations while meeting those of the spouse or domestic partner seeking maintenance.
Tthe court shall, without regard to misconduct, make such disposition of the property and the liabilities of the parties, either community or separate, as shall appear just and equitable after considering all relevant factors including, but not limited to:
(1) The nature and extent of the community property;
(2) The nature and extent of the separate property;
(3) The duration of the marriage or domestic partnership; and
(4) The economic circumstances of each spouse or domestic partner at the time the division of property is to become effective, including the desirability of awarding the family home or the right to live therein for reasonable periods to a spouse or domestic partner with whom the children reside the majority of the time.See question
conclusions of law?
The Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law provide a basis for a Decree of Dissolution, Order for Child Support, Parenting Plan, and other final orders. If the Findings are entered by agreement, the court need not include a lot of detail. If the Findings are entered after trial, the court may include some specific information about how income was calculated, why the court deviated from the guideline amount (or why not), etc.
The Child Support Order itself contains findings to justify entry of the order. The Decree contains findings to justify entry of the order as a final order.
Look at the mandatory Findings of Fact form, as well as the mandatory Child Support Order form. They include the required language.
The forms can be found at
boyfriend had a pre trial confrence to resolve the visitation issue his ex and him do not agree on. the judge verbally told the mother she needed to allow him to start seeing his daughter and stated it be wednesday and sunday for short periods of ...
If the judge issued a court order, the order can be enforced. The judge may not have intended for the discussion at the pre-trial conference to constitute a court order.
If the judge's comments were not in the form of a written order, a motion for temporary orders may be filed. At a hearing on temporary orders the court can enter a temporary parenting plan. That parenting plan will be in place pending further court order or trial. Your boyfriend need not retain counsel to address these issues, but working with an attorney could really help.
Good luck.See question
My ex-husband and I live 5 hours apart and meet in a half way point every other weekend. Since it's holiday break, the kids spend half of the break with me and half with him. The weekends have gotten out of whack because of this so it would cause...
There is not a strict rule for this type of communication. A good rule of thumb is: be reasonable. If court action becomes necessary, make sure you can print your text message. If you cannot print the text message, I recommend you send an email. You can always send a text message duplicating the email and/or notifying your ex to check email.
You can also call to communicate about this issue and then follow up with an email confirming the discussion.
You might consider switching to 1st 3rd (and 5th) weekends of the month to avoid confusion.
Finally, if this continues to be a problem, you should review paragraph V. of the parenting plan. Most provide for dispute resolution through Mediation with notice by mail (or certified mail). A short letter stating,
"I am invoking dispute resolution under paragraph V. of our parenting plan to resolve the ongoing dispute we have regarding communication, exchanges and scheduling". I will be contacting our agreed upon mediator to schedule a time if I do not have your agreement to respond to texts and emails regarding the children within 24 hours",
might do the trick.
Alan FunkSee question
I recently found out that my husband used a fake id when we got married and his last name is spelled wrong. His last name is Venegas but on our marrage license its spelled Benegas, are we even married?
A marriage is voidable under RCW 26.04.130 Voidable marriages. "When either party to a marriage shall be incapable of consenting thereto, for want of legal age or a sufficient understanding, or when the consent of either party shall be obtained by force or fraud, such marriage is voidable, but only at the suit of the party laboring under the disability, or upon whom the force or fraud is imposed."
If you are competent to be married, intended to be married and believed you were married, the court will likely find the marriage is valid.See question
my son (he is almost 17) participate in therapy with him (the both of them together). My son is the one who found pics (hundreds) of young girls in various stages of undress and turned him in and was the main witness against him. Can the court m...
The law limits contact between a person convicted of a sex offense and his minor children. The statute addressing the issue is convulted. Below are paraphrased sections of RCW 26.09.191.
There is a presumption that a parent who has been convicted as an adult of a sex offense against a child poses a present danger to a child. Unless the parent rebuts this presumption, the court shall restrain the parent from contact with a child.
If the court finds that the parent has met the burden of rebutting the presumption, the court may allow residential time with the child supervised by a neutral and independent adult and pursuant to an adequate plan for supervision of such residential time.
A court shall not order unsupervised contact between the offending parent and a child of the offending parent who was sexually abused by that parent. A court may order unsupervised contact between the offending parent and a child who was not sexually abused by the parent after the presumption under (d) of this subsection has been rebutted and supervised residential time has occurred for at least two years with no further arrests or convictions of sex offenses involving children.
The law contains many more details, but this remains a complex area of law. You should seek the assistance of an attorney.
My former wife and I shared physical custody of our children. Recently, I relocated to Texas because I was unable to find fulltime work in Washington State. I filed a NOTICE OF INTENDED RELOCATION OF CHILDREN with the court but, after conducting...
Filing a Notice of Intent to Relocate does not schedule a hearing. If you also filed a motion, in King County, you call the clerk's office and inform them you want to strike the hearing. I expect Pierce County would be similar.
If you had a shared custody arrangement, you should consult with an attorney to review the factors listed in RCW 26.09.520.See question
will sue another attorney in Washington state on a contingency basis? I am a medical professional and can provide solid details.
Most attorneys that handle legal malpractice cases work on a contingency fee. If an attorney is not willing to work on a contingency fee, the attorney probably thinks you don't have a strong case.See question
I recently attended a hear where the judge had listen to the parties and issued and order. I had to leave shortly after the hearing to catch a flight at the airport. I recently reviewed the documents and found that the judge had allowed opposi...
It is normally a bad idea to leave the courtroom without reviewing and acknowledging receipt of the court order. When a party leaves without signing an order, the court will usually mark, “refused to sign” or “left without signing”. That probably translates to “threw a fit and left in anger”.
It is not unusual for orders to need clarification or additional information after the court issues an oral decision. In that case, the parties appear before the court again to address the disputed issues. If you left before the orders were signed, that was the risk you took.
The law does allow a judge to change his or her mind.
If the oral decision conflicts with the written decision, the written decision controls. Ferree v. Doric Co., 62 Wash.2d 561, 567, 383 P.2d 900 (1963).
An oral decision “is necessarily subject to further study and consideration, and may be altered, modified, or completely abandoned. It has no final or binding effect, unless formally incorporated into the findings, conclusions, and judgment.” Ferree, 62 Wash.2d at 567, 383 P.2d 900.
See Grieco v. Wilson, 144 Wash. App. 865, 872, 184 P.3d 668, 671-72, 2008 WL 2231465 (2008) aff'd sub nom. In re Custody of E.A.T.W., 168 Wash. 2d 335, 227 P.3d 1284, 2010 WL 653866 (2010).
Having said the above, it should be considered unusual for a court to make material changes to an order after an oral decision was issued when one party was not available. You might bring a motion for reconsideration to address the issue.See question
Everyone has to have a psychological evaluation done for a custody matter. The other side is saying bad things about me trying to make me look like a bad parent. I can prove they are lying with documents. I was told to bring anything I want the ev...
I wrote a legal guide for AVVO on this topic:
I hope you find it helpful,
-Alan FunkSee question