9.5
| Experience |
|
| Industry Recognition |
|
| Professional Conduct |
|
Practice Areas |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Hourly ($500/hour), Retainer (Always)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||
Contact Information |
|
||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||
About MePhotos (8)Videos (1) |
E. Thomas Dunn, Jr. is an appellate practitioner based in Tustin, California, handling both state and federal appeals, writs, and law and motion matters... more View all photos and/or videos |
Client Reviews |
 “Excellent Attorney!!!”Posted by: Alexis, 9 months ago.
Client Review:
Mr. Dunn was an absolute blessing. I was facing some serious jail time after getting arrested for my 3rd DUI. Not only did he handle my case with the...
more
Flag
“Outstanding, first-class representation”Posted by: Tom, 11 months ago.
Client Review:
I was facing a career-ending charge, and Mr. Dunn's knowledge of the system and the law made it possible for me to keep my professional license and...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 Someone once said of Attorney Dunn's writing, "It sings." I could not agree more. Attorney Dunn's writing is artful. I highly recommend this... more Endorsement from lawyer: Sylvia Havens , Huntington Beach (CA), 3 months ago I endorse this lawyer. This man is a certified Appellate Specialist. I have recommended him in this area on several occasions! We have worked... more Endorsement from lawyer: Michael Bialys , Newbury Park (CA), 6 months ago |
License |
28 years since Edward Thomas Dunn Jr was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 3
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Reversed decision of Court of Appeal
Outcome: Convictions for misappropriation of public funds reversed for insufficient evidence
Outcome: Won judgment permitting parent to enforce child support awards with contempt remedy.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Publications |
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|
