Skip to main content
Christopher John McCann
Avvo
Pro

Christopher McCann’s Legal Cases

4 total

  • People v. Vincent A.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Oct 23, 2002
    Outcome:
    Not Guilty
    Description:
    Mr. McCann's client was a 24 year-old man on juvenile probation for attempted murder when he was arrested for Criminal Threats (Penal Code § 422) against his neighbor. Just prior to the client's arrest, the neighbor's son had recently been stabbed by the client's son during an altercation. After that incident, the neighbor had called the police but the client's child was not been arrested. The neighbor, though she had previously been friends with the client's wife, never liked the client, and she was particularly upset at him for what his child had done to her child. Several days after the incident between their children, the neighbor alleged that the client approached her alone in a dark alley and said he would kill her for calling the police on his kid. The neighbor had the client arrested for allegedly threatening to kill her. The client was charged with the criminal threat as well as violating his juvenile attempted murder probation. Despite the fact the judge allowed the jury to learn the client was on probation for attempted murder, Mr. McCann showed that the neighbor was convicted thief who could not be believed, particularly because of her anger at the client for the incident involving her children. Mr. McCann then called witnesses to show that the threat could not have happened when the neighbor alleged it happened because the client was reading to his children at the time. Though before the trial the judge stated, "Mr. McCann, I don't see how you have a defense to this case," the jury came back and acquitted the defendant and the judge reinstated the client on probation. NOTE: The aforementioned result does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction of the results or outcome of your case.
  • People v. Robert M.

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Jun 18, 2009
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed.
    Description:
    Mr. McCann’s client was arrested and charged with DUI with a blood alcohol level of .24 (three times the legal limit.) Mr. McCann moved to suppress the evidence in court because the client’s vehicle was stopped without reasonable suspicion. The arresting officer alleged that the client had been driving his vehicle at night without his headlights on. Mr. McCann showed receipts and called the client and several friends to the stand to testify that, in fact, the client and his friends had just fixed the headlights that night, and the friends watched the client turn on his headlights and drive off just minutes before being stopped for allegedly not having his headlights on! The judge found the officer not credible and ruled that the client was stopped without reasonable suspicion. The judge ordered all the evidence suppressed. The district attorney was forced to dismiss their case. In the client’s DMV hearing, Mr. McCann successfully argued that the DMV’s only exhibit demonstrating any evidence of DUI—known as the “DS 367” form—was inadmissible as not having proper evidentiary foundation under Evidence Code § 1280. Consequently, the DMV hearing officer would not receive the document into evidence and was forced to set aside the action against the client. NOTE: The aforementioned result does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction of the results or outcome of your case.
  • People v. Lee P.

    Practice Area:
    DUI & DWI
    Date:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed and DMV action set aside
    Description:
    Mr. McCann’s client was a 19 year-old who was pulled over for weaving within his lane and straddling between lanes. The client was found to have a blood alcohol level of .06%. The client was charged in court with being a minor driving with a blood alcohol level over .05%, and he had his license suspended by the DMV until a hearing was held for violating the DMV’s “zero tolerance” law of being a minor with a blood alcohol level of .01% or higher. Mr. McCann filed a motion contesting the legality of the stop in court. Mr. McCann brought in witnesses to testify against the officer and show that the client was not weaving or straddling lanes and the judge dismissed the case. Mr. McCann also brought in numerous witnesses to the DMV hearing and showed through calculating speed, distance and time, that the client was not weaving or straddling lanes and, under current case law, the period of time during which the officer’s observations occurred was insufficient to support the officer’s alleged observations of weaving and lane-straddling necessary to justify the stop. The DMV set aside the suspension order and re-instated the client’s driving privileges. As a result of the dismissal by the court and the DMV, the client was able to keep his license and his job. NOTE: The aforementioned result does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction of the results or outcome of your case.
  • People v. Latoya A.

    Practice Area:
    Criminal Defense
    Date:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed.
    Description:
    Mr. McCann’s client was charged with multiple counts of fraud through the use of stolen credit cards. Due to the ineptitude of the federal investigator working the case, the case was not filed until 9 months after the incident, leaving the client with no memory of where she was the day the alleged fraud occurred. After a thorough investigation, Mr. McCann uncovered how a merchant mistakenly connected the client’s computer records to one of the fraudulent purchases. In addition, Mr. McCann was able to show through medical and pharmacy records that the client had a doctor’s appointment for her sick baby, and thus had an airtight alibi for the times during which the fraudulent purchases were made. After presenting this evidence to the district attorney, the case was dismissed. NOTE: The aforementioned result does not constitute a guarantee, warranty or prediction of the results or outcome of your case.