Case Conclusion Date:November 4, 2011
Practice Area:Employment / Labor
Outcome:defense verdict and selected as one of the top verdicts in the state for 2011 by the Daily Journal
Description:Handled the defense of a veterinarian in 2011 where he admitted that he asked for sex with his partner and admitted he used to call her names and then ending up terminating her. She claimed it was because he refused to have sex with her and he claimed it was because she was a poor partner and caused a problem with staff, clients and referrals.