Client Reviews
Not yet reviewed
Overview
Practice Areas
|
-
100% Intellectual Property
15 years, 100 cases
|
Fees and Payment Types
|
Fees
Hourly ($395/hour)
Payment types
Check, Credit Card
|
Contact Information
|
|
About Me
Photos (0)
Videos (0)
|
In my law practice, I have focused on all matters of clearance, analysis, prosecution,licensing,enforcement, and litigation of my clients' intellectual... more
|
References
Client Reviews
|
How would you rate this lawyer?
If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?
Review this lawyer
|
Peer Endorsements
|
Kelly Cunningham is a well-respected intellectual property attorney. He is very knowledgeable. He is also a respected member of the local legal...
more
Endorsement from lawyer:
Alec Rose
, Santa Monica (CA), Almost 4 years ago
|
Résumé
License
|
15 years since Kelly W. Cunningham was first licensed to practice law.
| State |
License status |
Year acquired |
Last updated by Avvo |
| California |
Active
|
1996 |
11/03/2011 |
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
Education
|
| School |
Major |
Degree |
Graduated |
| University of California at Los Angeles School of Law |
Law |
JD - Juris Doctor |
1995 |
| University of California - Los Angeles |
Materials Engineering |
BS - Bachelor of Science |
1989 |
|
Awards
|
| Award Name |
Granting Organization |
Date |
| American Electric Power Scholarship Award |
American Electric Power Company |
1984 |
|
Associations
|
| Position |
Association Name |
Duration |
| Member |
Association of Business Trial Lawyers |
|
| Member |
Beverly Hills Bar Association |
|
| Member |
Federal Bar Association |
|
| Member |
Federal Circuit Bar Association |
|
| Member |
Los Angeles County Bar Association |
|
| Member |
Los Angeles Intellectual Property Law Association |
|
| Member |
Santa Monica Bar Association |
|
| Member |
State Bar of California |
|
See all 8 association entries
|
Portfolio
Cases
|
Outcome: Willful patent infringement verdict upheld in part
|
|
