Groch v. General Motors Corp., 117 Ohio St.3d 192 (Ohio 2008).

Jacob Horst Huebert

Case Conclusion Date:February 21, 2008

Practice Area:Constitutional

Outcome:Court adopted position urged in OACTA amicus brief

Description:Plaintiff (Groch) challenged the constitutionality of Ohio's statute of repose for products liability actions. Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys (OACTA), in its amicus brief, opposed plaintiff's position. Ohio Supreme Court adopted the position urged in the OACTA amicus brief.