Arbino v. Johnson & Johnson, 116 Ohio St.3d 468 (Ohio 2007)

Jacob Horst Huebert

Case Conclusion Date:December 27, 2007

Practice Area:Constitutional

Outcome:Court adopted position consistent with amicus brief

Description:Plaintiff (Arbino) challenged constitutionality of Ohio's tort reform law. As amicus, the Ohio Association of Civil Trial Attorneys (OACTA), defended the law as constitutional. The Ohio Supreme Court adopted a position consistent with the OACTA amicus brief in holding that Ohio's tort reform legislation is costitutional.