Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Nelson et al., case no. 48-CV-10-1496 (Jan. 8, 2013)

Carl Eric Christensen

Case Conclusion Date:January 8, 2013

Practice Area:Real Estate

Outcome:Granting of Defendants' summary judgment motion.

Description:Holding that even though Wells Fargo asserted that a unsecured lot adjacent to a foreclosed parcel should have also been secured by the same foreclosed mortgage, Minnesota law did not allow Wells Fargo Bank to reform a mortgage to encumber that adjacent unencumbered lot because the subject mortgage was unambiguous.