Strickland v. Strickland, 589 So.2d 1033 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991)

Outcome: Reversed.

Description: Ivan represented a Former Wife who appealed a trial level decision that her remarriage was a substantial change in circumstances that justified terminating her exclusive use and possession of the former marital home. The written marital settlement agreement had given the Former Wife exclusive use of the home until the youngest child reached the age of 18 or the Former Wife decided to sell the home. Neither of those contingencies had happened so the Appeals Court reversed.