Richard V Stevens III

I am a military officer and medical provider who faced an adverse credentialing action. I hired attorney Richard V. Stevens to represent me in this military medical case. Mr. Stevens handled all of the major aspects of the case. He helped me through the initial summary suspension, QAI (Quality Ass...urance Investigation), the Credentials Committee/Function decision, and he represented me in the litigated Peer Review Hearing. During this process, Mr. Stevens explained all of my rights, options, and the implications of each. This included explaining reporting requirements to my state of licensure and the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). His advice was always careful and thorough, respectful of my desires, and often cited me to the applicable regulations. He was always timely with due dates and appointments. I sincerely feel that he took the time to understand my specific circumstances and answered my detailed questions with both clarity and honesty. Additionally, his wealth of experience in military law specifically (over 30+ years) provided invaluable guidance, which bolstered my confidence that our decisions would provide the best and appropriate defense. I appreciated his advocacy as we interfaced with various entities throughout my case. Mr. Stevens submitted multiple written rebuttals on my behalf during this process. His written submissions on my behalf were consistently clear, persuasive and thoroughly grounded in military and medical regulations. I appreciated the opportunity to be included in the drafting and revision process, which ensured the final documents were both accurate and complete. During the Peer Review Hearing, Mr. Stevens handled all aspects of the litigation. This included obtaining and admitting exhibits, delivering the opening statement, preparing and questioning the witnesses, assisting me with my written and verbal statements, and delivering the closing argument. His vast experience as a military law defense attorney, including in medical care, was invaluable. Many of the government representatives lacked experience with several of the processes, at which juncture Mr. Stevens was able to cite regulations to inform their decisions. His assistance and representation during the hearing was on point, well-prepared, and provided much needed reassurance to an otherwise fearsome experience. His arguments on my behalf were soundly logical, based on evidence and precedence and consistent with our position throughout since our initial written rebuttals. His closing statement was thorough, persuasive, and seamlessly integrated prepared arguments with additional admissions from the government position. It was clear that Mr. Stevens knew the applicable regulations and applied them in presenting my case. If you are facing adverse medical credentialing action in the military, I would strongly recommend hiring Mr. Stevens. He is an exceptionally experienced, powerful and effective defense attorney.

I am a military officer who faced the MEB/PEB (IDES) process based on medical issues I experienced. I hired Attorney Richard V. Stevens to assist and represent me after receiving the MEB results. Mr. Stevens assisted me with preparing and submitting an appeal of the MEB results, and a subsequent appe...al of the IPEB results. Attorney Stevens explained the MEB/PEB process, and my rights within the process. He discussed my case with me, the concerns and issues I had in the IDES process, and he worked with me on different drafts of my submissions until we were satisfied with the final packages. This included organizing and submitting evidence in support of my appeals. Ultimately, the outcome of my case was more favorable than the military originally recommended. Mr. Stevens' assistance in the process was timely, attentive, and always put my wishes first. It was such a relief to have a true advocate fighting for me. If you're fighting an unfavorable process in the military I would highly recommend hiring Attorney Stevens to represent you. His knowledge of the system was incredibly insightful to me and his advice was was correct at every turn. His work product was fantastic, he took what I was trying to say and expressed it cleanly. For me, the most important thing is that he was a committed advocate. Too many times, the appointed counsel from the military is overworked and understaffed, they can't dedicate any real time or consideration to your case. Mr. Stevens made me realize what it was finally like to have someone in my corner fighting for my interests instead of the military's interests.

I am a military officer who faced an involuntary administrative discharge board in which the military was attempting to end my career based on alleged misconduct. Mr. Stevens represented me in this case. Mr. Stevens assisted with all aspects of defending this case. He reviewed the evidence, he int...erviewed witnesses, he gathered evidence and statements, and he assisted me in preparing my rebuttal, and he prepared and submitted a rebuttal of his own. In Mr. Stevens' rebuttal, he attacked the claims of misconduct, arguing forcefully that I did not commit the alleged offense. He attacked the procedural errors and the government's incorrect legal interpretation of the situation. Ultimately, the board hearing recommended that I be retained, and the command concurred. Throughout the process, Mr. Stevens was highly responsive, professional, and reassuring during an extremely stressful period. He explained each step clearly, answered questions promptly, and provided candid, sound advice that allowed me to make informed decisions. His preparation and advocacy gave me confidence that my case was being handled with the highest level of care and competence. I would absolutely recommend Mr. Stevens to any service member facing adverse administrative or disciplinary action. His expertise, dedication, and professionalism made a decisive difference in my case.

I am a senior military noncommissioned officer who was falsely accused of sexual assault by another service member. As a result, I faced a general court-martial. Had I been convicted, I would have faced years of confinement and mandatory registration as a sex offender. Mr. Stevens represented me thro...ughout this process. Mr. Stevens handled every major aspect of my case. He drafted and argued multiple complex motions grounded in current and evolving military law. He prepared evidence and personally questioned all witnesses during the motion hearings, including my accuser. As a direct result of his preparation and advocacy during those hearings, significant and critical evidence was uncovered that became essential to the defense at trial. During the court-martial, Mr. Stevens delivered the opening statement, conducted direct examination of defense witnesses, and cross-examined the accuser, government witnesses, and the government’s expert. His questioning was precise, disciplined, and strategic. In particular, his cross-examination of the government’s expert demonstrated a deep understanding of both the subject matter and the weaknesses in the government’s theory of the case. Mr. Stevens’ cross-examination of the accuser was especially effective. He methodically exposed inconsistencies, credibility issues, and motives to fabricate, doing so in a professional manner that maintained credibility with the panel while clearly undermining the government’s case. His closing argument was thorough, well-organized, and compelling. He tied together the evidence, testimony, and credibility issues in a way that clearly demonstrated reasonable doubt and highlighted the government’s failure to meet its burden of proof. Ultimately, I was found not guilty of the alleged sexual assault. Mr. Stevens’ advice, preparation, courtroom advocacy, and strategic decision-making were critical to this outcome. Throughout the case, he was consistently available to answer questions, provided clear and honest advice, and ensured I understood the process and potential outcomes at every stage. His preparation was meticulous, his strategy was sound, and his courtroom presence was confident and effective. I would, without hesitation, recommend Mr. Stevens to anyone facing allegations or adverse actions within the military justice system, particularly cases involving sexual assault allegations. The stakes in these cases are extraordinarily high, and Mr. Stevens demonstrated the experience, judgment, and dedication necessary to defend them effectively.