9.4
| Experience | |
| Industry Recognition | |
| Professional Conduct |
Contributor level 8
Practice Areas |
|
||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fees and Payment Types |
Fees
Fixed (Always)
Payment types
Cash, Check, Credit Card
|
||||
Contact Information |
|
||||
Languages Spoken |
|
||||
About MePhotos (1)Videos (0) |
|
Client Reviews |
Average Client RatingCurrent or former client? Write a review
“David givesExcellent Representation and a Great Individual to work with, great problem solver and negotiator”Posted by: Stephen, over 2 years ago.
Client Review:
David Ganje has represented my business for many years and in a number of different capacities. David has always provided excellent representation...
more
Flag
“Highly recommended by Upstate NY LRIG, Inc.”Posted by: Glenn, over 2 years ago.
Client Review:
I am President of the local chapter of an international organization of professionals from the private, government and academic sectors working in...
more
Flag
|
|---|---|
Peer Endorsements |
 I endorse this lawyer's work. Attorney Ganje is a brilliant commercial law practitioner who deals with the firm I work at on a regular basis. We... more Endorsement from lawyer: Ryan Miller , Stratford (CT), Almost 3 years ago I endorse this lawyer's work. Attorney Ganje is a brilliant commercial law practitioner whose sterling reputation and credits attracted me to his... more Endorsement from lawyer: Max Rosenberg , Stratford (CT), Almost 3 years ago |
License |
37 years since David Lawrence Ganje was first licensed to practice law.
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Work Experience |
|
||||||||||||
Education |
|
||||||||||||
Awards |
|
||||||||||||
Associations |
|
Contribution |
Contributor Level 8
|
||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cases |
Outcome: Order for the Plaintiff, CIT Technology, Affirmed
Outcome: The court granted the purchaser's motion to compel.
Outcome: The court awarded the creditor a judgment against the debtor, declared that the creditor's judgment was nondischargeable, and dismissed the debtor's counterclaims.
|
||||||||||||||||||
Speaking Engagements |
|
