Skip to main content
Joseph Christopher Gioconda

Joseph Gioconda’s Legal Cases

7 total

  • Hermes International v. Lederer de Paris Fifth Avenue, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Oct 01, 2001
    Outcome:
    Successful jury verdict.
    Description:
    Successful jury verdict.
  • Burberry Ltd. (UK), et al. v. Burberry-Scarves.com, et al.

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Outcome:
    Default Judgment
    Description:
    Trademark counterfeiting and anti-cybersquatting case against numerous defendants who were using over forty-three (43) domain names with “Burberry” in their names to sell counterfeit Burberry merchandise. The Southern District of New York has granted a Default Judgment against the Defendants in the amount of $60,000,000 and issued a Permanent Injunction.
  • Tiffany & Co. v. BitchinBagz LLC, et al.

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Jul 20, 2011
    Outcome:
    Settled.
    Description:
    Anti-counterfeiting litigation in the Southern District of New York. Settlement.
  • Sherri Hill v. Nox Anabel, Inc.

    Practice Area:
    Copyright Infringement
    Outcome:
    Settled.
    Description:
    Represented distinguished prom and pageant dress designer Sherri Hill in a copyright and unfair competition case against a Los-Angeles based manufacturer and wholesaler.
  • Burberry Ltd. v. John Does

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Nov 22, 2011
    Outcome:
    Pending
    Description:
    Represents Burberry in large-scale counterfeiting case against numerous Defendants operating domains/websites.
  • Michael Kors v. John Does

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Dec 01, 2011
    Outcome:
    Pending
    Description:
    Represents Michael Kors in anti-counterfeiting case against numerous Defendants selling counterfeits on websites/domain names
  • La Quinta Worldwide v. QRTM SA de CV

    Practice Area:
    Trademark Infringement
    Date:
    Mar 29, 2012
    Outcome:
    Successful trial verdict - Judgment
    Description:
    On March 29, 2012, after a bench trial, the Court issued an Opinion and Order and entered Judgment in favor of La Quinta, finding that "La Quinta proved at trial that there is a likelihood of confusion between La Quinta's marks and the "Quinta Real" mark if Quinta Real were to build a hotel in the United States."