Skip to main content
David Lawrence Ganz

David Ganz’s Legal Cases

27 total

  • In re Newbold

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Apr 26, 2008
    Outcome:
    guardianship granted
    Description:
    15481/03 , SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, QUEENS COUNTY, 2007 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 389; 237 N.Y.L.J. 28, February 2, 2007, Decided A successor co-guardian of an incapacitated person's property was compensated $2,948.85 for regular guardianship duties pursuant to the formula in SCPA 2307; the co-guardian was also awarded $495 based on the rate in County Law § 722(b) for obtaining a lapsed pension and securing health insurance for the incapacitated person
  • Block 268 LLC v. City of Hoboken Rent Leveling and Stabilization Bd.

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Jan 01, 2006
    Outcome:
    Board RUling overturned
    Description:
    Block 268 LLC v. City of Hoboken Rent Leveling and Stabilization Bd., 401 N.J.Super. 544, 951 A.2d 1098, N.J.Super.L.,2006 case of first impression on sale of exempted building with rent control exemption in place
  • Gonzalez v Rite aid of NY

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Sep 26, 2008
    Outcome:
    case settled
    Description:
    In this action, plaintiff Lohengryn Gonzalez sues Rite Aid of New York, Inc. (“Rite Aid”) for discrimination on the basis of disability in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. (the “ADA”). He contends that Rite Aid failed to promote him because of his heart condition. Gonzalez also asserts wage and hour claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (the “FLSA”), and the New York State Labor Law. N.Y. Lab. § 190 et seq. (McKinney 2001) (the “Labor Law”). Plaintiff seeks reinstatement, money damages, and attorney's fees.
  • Rhodes v Tallarico

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Oct 30, 1990
    Outcome:
    Case dismissed as to PNG
    Description:
    Action for breach of warranty, misrepresentation, unfair and deceptive trade practices, and negligence was brought against rare coin dealer and Ohio numismatic organization. Numismatic organization moved to dismiss action for lack of personal jurisdiction. The District Court, Skinner, J., held that: (1) advertisements of Ohio numismatic organization in national trade magazines, which did not appear to be aimed specifically at Massachusetts' customers, did not subject organization to jurisdiction under Massachusetts' long-arm statute, and (2) organization was not subject to district court's jurisdiction under Massachusetts' long-arm statute based on fact that member of organization possessed minimum contacts with Massachusetts, absent any evidence that organization exercised any influence over members' decision to perform services in Massachusetts.Motion to dismiss allowed
  • In re International COin & CUrrency

    Practice Area:
    Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
    Date:
    Sep 26, 1984
    Outcome:
    Successful Chapter 7 Reorganization
    Description:
    When ICCI filed for bankruptcy reorganization, it was the largest in the history of Vermont, the equivalent of a company with 3,500 employees in Brooklyn N.Y., filing (given the population of Washington COunty). AS the largest single unsecured creditor, the Food & Agriclture Organization of the United Nationssought to have the bankruptcy reorganization succeed, keep debtor's attorney fees and professional fees to a minimum, and get an approved plan. FAO guided that process as an unsecured creditor.A testament to the success of this work is that ICCI (in 2008) is still in business, long since out of bankruptcy.
  • FTC v Oak Tree

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Nov 02, 1994
    Outcome:
    Client settled satisfactorily with FTC
    Description:
    Typical FTC grading and pricing case for rare coins (see 95 POF3d 155 (2007). Work out with FTC over restitution and redress. FUll charge over final settlement for all (multiple) parties.
  • Connoly v. Borough of Bogota, Not Reported in F.Supp.2d, 2008 WL 915126, D.N.J., March 27, 2008 (NO. CIV.A. 07-2083(FSH))

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    settled
    Description:
    bar fight involving police officers of a municipality and claim of civil rights violations.