Skip to main content
David Lawrence Ganz

David Ganz’s Legal Cases

27 total

  • Portuguese State Mint v. Redman

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Feb 04, 1994
    Outcome:
    Judgment fror the Mint
    Description:
    International law-statee mint in Portugal in dispute with CIncinnatti-based supplier. Judgment recovered for the Mint.
  • Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC) v J.I. Sopher & Co.

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Plaintiff recovers
    Description:
    Resolution Trust Corp. (RTC) v J.I. Sopher & Co., 1995 U.S.Dist. Lexis 11628 (SDNY 1995) (represents RTC)
  • Bregman v Meehan

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Plaintiff's verdict
    Description:
    Defendant signed contract to sell her home represented by attorney who absconded. Represented onspecific performane claim (unsuccessful trial)
  • In re Meehan

    Practice Area:
    Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
    Outcome:
    Petitioner's loss
    Description:
    Petitioner moed for bankruptcy to avoid specific performance on contract of sale ofhouse which was underpriced, compicated by na attorney who absconded with proceeds. In a case of first impression, the Court did not sustain the petition.
  • Italtrading Int'l Ltd. v DiStefano

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    Plaintiff's verdict
    Description:
    VErdict of $900,000 on breach of covenant not to compete
  • Matter of Brigandi

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Nov 06, 1990
    Outcome:
    PNG VErdict
    Description:
    Trade association challenged on members mandatory arbitration procedure. Ruled okay to so require.
  • Phillips, Son & Neale v Borghi & Co

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Jan 01, 1991
    Outcome:
    Settled
    Description:
    Suit ove auction of an artists entire portfolio (interpretation of auction law and NY consumer affair reegulations)
  • Sargia v Skil Corp.

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    settled
    Description:
    Professionll carpenter's saw allegedly malfunctioned cutting off a digit of the hand.
  • AT&TWireless v Paramus Board of adjustment

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Date:
    Jun 01, 2002
    Outcome:
    settled
    Description:
    AT&T sued Paramus Board of adjustment (represented by us as Board Attorey) over cell antennae placement. Settled.
  • Connolly v Boro of BOgota

    Practice Area:
    Litigation
    Outcome:
    (not available)
    Description:
    Police brutality claim