9.1
Superb
Client Ratings
Not yet reviewed
Overview
Practice Areas
|
|
Contact Information
|
|
References
Client Reviews
|
How would you rate this lawyer?
If you're a current or former client, share your thoughts (anonymously, if you prefer). Would you recommend this lawyer to other clients?
Review this lawyer
|
Endorsements
|
I know Ed through a discussion group of some of the most aware, client-centered lawyers practicing today. If you're looking for a good, experienced...
more
Endorsement from lawyer:
Joshua Paulin
, Boston (MA), About 1 year ago
|
Résumé
Licenses
|
-
30 years
since Edward Robert Wiest was first licensed to practice law in NY.
-
24 years
since Edward Robert Wiest was first licensed to practice law in NJ.
-
23 years
since Edward Robert Wiest was first licensed to practice law in MA.
See license details
Hide license details
| State |
License status |
Year acquired |
Last updated by Avvo |
| New York |
Due to reregister within 30 days of birthday |
1980 |
09/19/2008 |
| New Jersey |
Active |
1985 |
04/02/2008 |
| Massachusetts |
Active |
1986 |
11/08/2008 |
We have not found any instances of professional misconduct for this lawyer.
|
Work Experience
|
| Position |
Duration |
| Principal at Edward R. Wiest, P.C. |
1997–present
|
| Attorney at Tarlow, Breed, Hart & Rodgers, P.C. |
1991–1997
|
| Associate at Bradley, Barry & Tarlow, PC |
1986–1991
|
| Associate at Bressler, Amery & Ross, P.C. |
1984–1986
|
| Associate at Cahill Gordon & Reindel |
1979–1983
|
See all 5 job entries
Hide additional positions
|
Education
|
| School |
Major |
Degree |
Graduated |
| Harvard University Law School |
Law |
JD - Juris Doctor |
1979 |
| University of Pennsylvania |
American History/Economics |
BA - Bachelor of Arts |
1976 |
|
Associations
|
| Position |
Association Name |
Duration |
| Member, Solo and Small Firm Steering Committee (2002-current) |
Boston Bar Association |
1986–2008
|
| Member, Executive Committee 2003-2006 |
Frank J. Murray American Inn of Court |
1997–2008
|
|
Portfolio
Avvo Answers
|
Avvo Contribution:
stock loss
Presuming your broker was not Lehman itself (which should be viewed as out of money), the key... more
|
|
