Suzanne Shaw Storm

Suzanne Shaw Storm

also known as Suzanne S. Storm

4.3
Rating: 7.0

Licensed for 22 years

Estate planning Lawyer Practice Areas: Estate Planning, Trusts, Real Estate ... +2 more
This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Not Practicing

About Suzanne

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Suzanne Shaw Storm's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.3 /5.0

6 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (6) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Michael | January 18, 2019 | Hired Attorney | Business

I would strongly recommend Suzanne Storm to anyone who needs or wants a great attorney.

Suzanne Storm is intelligent, hard working and a great lawyer. She has directed our small construction corp through small and large issues and we continue to count on her knowledge and expertise. Suzanne is honest and reliable, she has advised and created an Estate Plan for me and my family. She ma...de us all feel informed, comfortable and confidant.

Posted by Eric | August 29, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Real Estate

Attorney

I am an attorney, real estate developer and have various other businesses. We use Suzanne Storm for all our legal work except for the rare time when she will refer us to someone else when she does not consider herself an expert on a particular issue. We have retained Suzanne in many different matte...rs both litigation, transactional and employee related over the last 5+ years. She is truly a gifted attorney and great person. She goes above and beyond for her clients with her dedication and hard work. I am very proud to say that we have NEVER lost a matter with Suzanne, and there have been some very difficult and complicated ones. She is not the kind that would “guarantee" us a success, but she goes above and beyond to make it happen. As I mentioned, I am an attorney myself, and I am not an easy client. I am very demanding and expect the very best. I am very happy to say that I consider Suzanne an attorney’s attorney - in other words, where attorneys go when they need help. I believe that is the best compliment I could give her. You should definitely take the time to meet with Suzanne and I am sure you will be convinced as well.

Posted by Marilyn | August 24, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Trusts

Suzanne Storm, dependable professional attorney

I needed sound, practical guidance in administering a family trust. The OC Bar referral service connected me to Suzanne Storm at Attlesey Storm LLP in Tustin. Suzanne—as well as her office team—did the job beautifully, guiding me clearly toward completing the process. All the while, Suzanne remained ...mindful and sensitive to everyone affected by the situation. In my interactions with her, Suzanne proved herself to be a responsible, ethical lawyer who offered healthy, fair legal advice at reasonable expense. From the get-go, Suzanne stated she could do as much or as little as I wanted, letting me know what tasks I could do (like submitting files to county court, county agencies, etc.) to save the trust money. Suzanne kept track of the process, she cleared up some murky details that would never occur to me (like state tax obligations), and overall she offered measured support in making sure the trust was implemented properly. In stark comparison, I first contacted the attorney who drew up the trust for my parents: in one phone call he was impatient, condescending, and unprofessional as he made disparaging remarks about my siblings. Suzanne is a first-rate, highly professional attorney. On top of that she is very personable, which made a stressful process manageable.

Posted by Eric | August 24, 2018 | Hired Attorney | Business

Business Owner

Suzanne has provided counsel for me and my business over the past five years for a number of different reasons. As a construction company, I have mostly needed guidance with subcontract agreements and other legal complexities regarding the business. She has been extremely helpful in each and every ma...tter. I highly recommend her.

Posted by anonymous | June 07, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Real Estate

Now What?

I own an investment property 50/50 with a partner who used to be my handyman, consisting of a Victorian house, and 7 rental units. I put the down payment, and my partner moved into the house. At first everything was fine, until he stopped supplying accounting. statements and tenant/rental info. He... fixed up the inside of the 6 bdrm / 4 bath house he was living in, but never did anything to the rental units that we had agreed on. He rented those units to family members at way below market rates, and later let the yard and property fall into disrepair. He stopped paying his $400.00 monthly rent, and after several years of trying to get him to comply, he started hiding from me, so I finally hired an attorney, Suzanne Storm of Attlesey/Storm. She told me she had a lot of experience in real estate matters and partnerships. She did all the necessary paperwork and filings, and prepared the case for trial, which began a year later. On the day of trial, the opposing attorney offered to settle. As much evidence as we had, Suzanne pushed me to settle as well, and warned that trial could take three days, and we were not sure how the Judge would rule. The opposing attorney was very difficult to work with, and came up with all sorts of crazy reasons why my partner did the things he did. He also made false allegations against me, so she thought it was best to settle, which would save me money in fees. She stated we would settle under the condition that each partner would get a professional appraisal of the property within 30 days, and present it to each other. If a purchase amount could be agreed upon, my partner would purchase my 50% share. If we could not agree to an amount, then the two original appraisers would recommend a third appraiser, and we would be bound by this appraiser’s value, whatever he came up with. Furthermore, my partner would have 90 days to secure financing, and another 60 days to close. If he could not get financing, we would list the property for sale. Additionally, my partner would provide monthly accounting, and bank statements, clean up the yard, and maintain the property. Within 30 days I had my appraisal, but my partner did not. I granted him another two weeks as he requested, but he did not meet that date as well. In the meantime, he had my appraisal, which he claimed represented a value that was too high. I suggested we put the property on the market at my appraiser's determined value and see what happens, but he declined. In the meantime, two months passed with no progress, so I called Suzanne, and advised her he was not complying with the Settlement Agreement, and suggested we go back to court and advise the Judge. Also, I had not received any accounting or bank statements, and mentioned that the property was still in the same poor condition. I then looked up my case online, and it showed settled, with no further court dates scheduled. I was shocked, since it was my opinion it was still an active case, and now I found myself with no recourse to force my partner to comply. Suzanne put another attorney in her office on my case, and after I stated I felt no closer in resolving this matter, then I did when I started the lawsuit, Suzanne became offended, and quit on me. The thing is I was only being honest, I didn't mean to upset her. In addition, my legal bill was almost $60,000.00, and now I was required to hire another attorney, or proceed by myself. She ended up calling a courier to deliver my documents, and we set up a payment plan to pay the balance owed to her. So, here I am, proceeding by myself to get my partner to comply, without her help. After all this money I spent, I can't afford to hire another attorney, and now I don't know what to do. Plus, there's the issue of getting someone to learn and become familiar with my case. I'm wondering now if I should have gone to trial like my instinct originally told me. From: A Distraught & Broke Client

See All Client Reviews

Suzanne Shaw Storm's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Suzanne

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.0 (Very Good)

Honors

2003

Certificate in Dispute Resolution, Straus Institute for Dispute Resolution

2002

CALI Excellence for the Future- Negotiation & Dispute Resolution, CALI Excellence for the Future Award®

Work Experience

2009 - Present

Owner/Partner, Attlesey | Storm, LLP

2006 - 2009

Partner, Attlesey, Thomlinson & Clark, LLP

2003 - 2005

Associate Attorney, Wood, Smith, Henning & Berman, LLP

Associations

2017 - Present

State Bar of California, Trusts and Estates Section

Member

2017 - Present

WealthCounsel

Member

2017 - Present

Orange County Women Lawyers Association

Member

2006 - Present

Orange County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

DM Residential Fund II, LLC v. First Tennessee Bank N.A.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit affirmed dismissal of purchaser's lawsuit after suing the lender for failing to disclose a utility easement defect.

Doran Lofts, LLC v. Dove Street Capital Lenders, LLC

California Court of Appeal affirmed dismissal of borrower's complaint for claims against commercial lender.

Ledesma v. JP Morgan Chase, N.A.

California Court of Appeal affirmed trial court's dismissal of borrower's complaint and sanctions award of $60,000 against borrower and his attorney.

Miller v. Collectors Universe, Inc.

California Court of Appeal affirmed trial court's interpretation of Civil Code section 3344(a) in favor of client.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2003

Pepperdine University School of Law

J.D.

2000

Hofstra University

B.A.

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution