Robert Philip Greenspoon

Robert Philip Greenspoon

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 30 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at Chicago, IL
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Intellectual Property, Patent Application, Appeals

333 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL

About Robert

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Patent Infringement 55%

Prosecuting and defending patent cases across the country for national and international clients.

31 years

55%
Appeals 15%

Federal appeals in any practice area, with a proven record of success.

25 years

15%
Intellectual Property 15%

Litigation and counseling in copyright, trademark, trade secret and related contract and business tort matters.

31 years

15%
Patent Application 15%

Patent prosecution at all levels of sophistication for individuals, companies and universities.

31 years

15%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Illinois for 30 years

State: Illinois

Acquired: 1995

Active and Authorized to Practice Law

No misconduct found

Licensed in Minnesota for 28 years

State: Minnesota

Acquired: 1998

Not Authorized - Resigned - Cle: Restricted-Voluntary

No misconduct found

Location

Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig, PLLC

333 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 2700, Chicago, IL, 60601

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Robert Philip Greenspoon's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Robert Philip Greenspoon's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Robert
David Arthur Skeels headshot
David Skeels

Patent infringement lawyer | Mar 10

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Mr. Greenspoon has the perfect mix of intellectual horsepower and down-home charisma to make him a valuable weapon in the courtroom and a dear friend outside of it. I would recommend him unconditionally to any intellectual property client who wants smart, aggressive, and wise counsel."

Michael R Laporte headshot
Michael Laporte

Patent infringement lawyer | Aug 27

Relationship: Co-worker

"Rob is one of the smartest and hard working attorneys I've had the pleasure of working with."

View All Endorsements
David Arthur Skeels headshot
David Skeels

Intellectual property lawyer

Michael R Laporte headshot
Michael Laporte

Patent infringement lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2026

Illinois Super Lawyer, Illinois Super Lawyers

2018

IAM Strategy 300, Intellectual Asset Management Magazine

2017

NLJ Trailblazers - Intellectual Property, The National Law Journal

2012

Illinois 2012 Super Lawyer, Intellectual Property Litigation, Super Lawyers

2010

Illinois Rising Star 2010, Super Lawyers

2010

"Small Claims" Article Republished in Patent Law Review, Thomson-West

2009

Illinois Rising Star 2009, SuperLawyers

2007

Peer Review Rated Lawyer, Martindale Hubbell

Work Experience

2021 - Present

Partner, Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig, PLLC

2007 - 2021

Member, Flachsbart & Greenspoon, LLC

1996 - 2007

Shareholder, Niro, Scavone, Haller & Niro

1995 - 1996

Law Clerk to the Honorable Brian Barnett Duff, United States District Court, Northern District of Illinois

Sample of Legal Cases

Petro Mex v. United States

Reversed bench trial judgment of government nonliability for breach of a mineral lease agreement.

ADASA. v. Avery Dennison

Affirmed patent eligibility of RFID technology, affirmed 9-figure damages award.

1st Media v. Electronic Arts

Argued appeal and won reversal for patentee of judgment of inequitable conduct.

Lear Corp. v. Johnson Controls, Inc.

Won jury verdict and judgment for client.

Newegg, Inc. v. Telecommunication Systems, Inc.

Case transferred to USDC District of Maryland

Newegg, Inc. v. Telecommunication Systems, Inc.

Transfer/Remand - Transfer to Another District

1st Technology v. Bodog

Obtained preliminary injunction

Nilssen v. Lightech

Dismissed with prejudice after settlement.

Bliski v. Doll

ValueClick v. Revenue Science

Dismissed with prejudice after settlement.

1st Technology v. Bodog

Won appeal seeking to overturn $50M judgment

HyperPhrase v. Google

Won appeal for reversal of summary judgment

IMS Technologies v. Haas Automation

Won appeal for reversal of summary judgment

ValueClick v. AOL

See More Legal Cases

Education

1995

University of Michigan Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1992

University of Chicago

A.B., Physics

Speaking Engagements

2010

Patentable Subject Matter After the Supreme Court Bilski Opinion

Patentable Subject Matter

2010

Patent Prosecution and Litigation after In Re Bilski Patentable Subject Matter

2008

University of Chicago Science and Technology Immersion Camp

Science Careers in Law

Publications

2009

Minnesota Journal of Law, Science and Technology Is the United States Finally Ready for a Patent Small Claims Court?

2007

2006

IP Litigator Are Patent Trolls Really Undermining the Patent System?
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution