Nathaniel Burney

Nathaniel Burney

also known as Nathan Burney

4.6
Rating: 1.0

Licensed for 28 years

Criminal defense Lawyer Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, Federal Crime, White Collar Crime, Appeals
This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020
See Details

About Nathaniel

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Criminal Defense 50%

Defense of criminal investigations and prosecutions in all boroughs of New York City and the surrounding counties.

20 years

50%
Federal Crime 20%

Defense of criminal investigations and prosecutions in the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York.

20 years

20%
White Collar Crime 20%

Defense of criminal investigations and prosecutions of white-collar crime (fraud, securities, antitrust, regulatory, computer) and associated civil actions.

20 years

20%
Appeals 10%

Criminal appeals before the New York state appellate courts, the Second Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States.

20 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 500-700 per hour


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Maryland for 19 years

State: Maryland

Acquired: 2007

Inactive - Retired

Licensed in New York for 26 years

State: New York

Acquired: 1999

Disbarred

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2020

Licensed in District of Columbia for 28 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1997

Administratively Suspended - Non-Payment of Dues

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Nathaniel Burney's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.6 /5.0

19 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (19) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 5 of 5 reviews | Responsiveness

Posted by anonymous | March 15, 2013 | Criminal Defense

We are exceedingly lucky to have him

I have approached Mr. Burney on two occasions as a potential client, and received legal advice from him on these two occasions. As it happens, I am a practicing attorney and have also been a client in the sense of hiring him to assist me on cases on three other occasions. These matters are more... appropriate for a Peer Review so I will refer to these cases as little as possible in this review. However, I did meet Mr. Burney initially in regard to the most serious criminal defense matter that I have ever handled so I do wish to mention how we met. In this matter, a man that I knew to be a very good guy, and who had hurt no one was facing the potential of going to jail for the rest of his productive life. I had gone in to help him for his arraignment, and when I got the defense packet I nearly had a heart attack. It seemed from my limited understanding of that area of the law that my client had no defense at all. Shortly afterwards while reading the Wall Street Journal online I saw a mention that the Supreme Court had overruled a constitutional doctrine that had held for 17 years, and the facts of my case were so close to this case that it appeared my client had a serious potential defense. I posted online to try to find an attorney who was familiar with this new case. Mr. Burney responded almost immediately stating that he had already written a blog posting about the case (the Supreme Court had made its decision perhaps less than 48 hours prior to this first email from Mr. Burney). From the receipt of this email, I was in his office within a couple of hours and he proved most helpful to this matter which after many month eventually resulted in my client getting a disposition in which he never did a night in jail. My next experience with Mr. Burney was in the midst of one of the most shocking crises of my life. He was not the only attorney who assisted me in this matter, but there was one complexity of the matter I brought to Mr. Burney who gave an excellent road map of how to diffuse the crisis. As it happens, I did not hire him on this occasion but rather utilized his advice to handle it on my own. The matter was dismissed on account of the governments failure to do anything within a procedural time limit. Regardless, his assistance in this matter is something I could never forget. More recently, I was handed a summons by an undercover police office as part of an end of the month dragnet on the platform of the Union Square subway station at rush hour for the crime of having been smushed against a metal railing by my fellow passengers on the express train. Mr. Burney gave me some advice as to how to deal with that matter as well -- it was rapidly dismissed. Mr. Burney is wickedly smart, cheerful, gentlemanly, profound in his philosophical observations about the law, up to date in his use of technology and easy to reach. Until recently I didn't know that he was an author and only after I started reading his book did I realize that he had illustrated it himself, and there are a lot of illustrations. I see Mr. Burney as a profoundly ethical attorney in the sense that he doesn't so much act ethically because there are ethical rules mandated by the profession but because he really understands how much society benefits by people acting ethically. His understanding of the areas of law that he practices in are nothing short of profound. He has great knowledge of the workings of the courts. There is one incident that tremendously stands out in my mind about Mr. Burney's abilities. I brought a matter to him where I thought my client had technically committed a crime by violating a provision of the NYC admin hoursing code. Mr. Burney looked up the statute on his cellphone and showed me in less than 2 mins that my client was probably innocent -- the case was soon dismissed.

Posted by Frankie | March 13, 2013 | Criminal Defense

My experience with Nathaniel Burney

I got arrested for possession with intent to sell. This was and is my only offense. My girlfriend found Mr.Burney online and he met with me right away. He was really patient with me and answered any questions that I had. I wanted this to be over as quickly and painlessly as possible, and that's what ...Mr.Burney did for me. He was able to get me into an outpatient program and no jail time, which was the best thing that could of happen for me. I've been clean ever since and I wouldn't have done it any other way, or with any other representation.

Posted by anonymous | March 11, 2013 | Criminal Defense

Unresponsive, inefficient and rude

Nathan Burney comes off as a very weird character. Which tricked me as he tries to make that pass that as "genius" and "too smart to be understood". I made a poor decision in hiring him, based on the fact that he didn't appear to "hardcore" sell his services as some do, and that he had worked w...ith the DA's office which according to him, made him the best choice and justified him "being very expensive". I regret that my distressed state of mind led me to hire him versus a more "traditional" and aggressive lawyer. He is very ill at ease and shy when you meet him, strangely his name is unknown at the registration desk, nor does it appear anywhere in the office he shares. He pretended to not know I was coming from Avvo, or that he was well rated here and comes on top of searches. This white lie was a red flag. Nathan Burney gets ALL of his clients through Avvo. By the way I have asked Avvo to look into his reviews which I find very surprising. The main issues I faced with him : - he only responds per email, often after a week or two. He will never, ever pick up the phone, so don't expect reactivity. He failed to respond to other attorneys I then hired to make sure my case was going in the right direction. - while I didn't particularly expect sympathy, he became plain rude and unresponsive the minute he received the retainer. - he hardly took any attention to my case, as he "was busy writing a book". The only reason he took me on was to finance his lifestyle but he could not show more disinterest in what was happening to me, and the blatant and obvious fact I was wrongly accused by my spiteful ex. - his lack of attention and available time resulted in his total failure to negotiate anything (which takes time and understanding of the case). In fact, he was indeed the DA's best friend and besides sending rude and contemptuous remarks, he never lifted a finger to close the case in my favor. - he never read all the material I sent him to give strong arguments against my ex's ludicrous claims. - he took the opposing counsel's first offer and left it at that, and did the same thing with the DA. Of course, because that required no effort. I would strongly recommend you think twice before hiring him.

Posted by anonymous | October 21, 2012 | Criminal Defense

Good talker, not so good lawyer

In my experience with Nathaniel Burney as my criminal defense attorney, he was an incredibly charming, and witty gentlemen. Unfortunately, that is where much of appreciation for his service ends. In my experience with Mr. Burney, he has continued to maneuver around granting me the services that he cl...aimed he would provide. Some of my issues with Mr. Burney are as small as providing copies of paper work that has been submitted to him and being able to communicate thoroughly about the issues of my case. Some issues are much bigger because they stem from his decisions to reject, redirect and flat out avoid my questions and the services that I reasonably asked him to implore. Other issues stem from a fundamental disagreement about the direction of my case going forward. After paying a HEFTY retainer fee for his legal services, Mr. Burney had said that his services would require much more money and he would be less than zealous in my defense if those fees were not received. It is abundantly reasonable for a professional to charge a significant fee for a significant matter. What is not reasonable is paying such a fee when you are not comfortable with that professional's level of service and/or efficacy in the case up to date. I would have been much more able to invest my trust in Mr. Burney's abilities if his continued assurances were not hollow and repetitive. According to Mr. Burney, he is a busy man. In his own words, he stated that he had not had a trial "in ages and was aching for one". At the time, he indicated he had no expectation to become occupied within the near future. After receiving his retainer fee, Mr. Burney immediately told me he became a representative in two other criminal court trials. This inconvenience is furthered by the week that he formally requested to handle prior responsibilities. Mr. Burney fairly informed me he would need three specific days out of the week to invest in other responsibilities. As we proceeded closer to these dates, his need for time grew into that entire week. This issue of availability is furthered by the fact that he is unavailable over the weekends. Nathaniel Burney is an incredibly intelligent and charming professional. It is unfortunate that his choice not to serve my best interest in my case ultimately led to his dismissal.

Posted by Valerie | July 15, 2010 | Criminal Defense

Nathan Burney did more than I expected

When my son got into trouble, it was the first time. I looked at the possible penalties he was facing. I considered letting him go with a court-appointed attorney, But the stakes were too high. I called Nathan and he answered his phone even though it was almost midnight. He met with my son the ...next morning, and I waited nervously, thinking of ways to post bail. When Nathan called, my son was with him and his charges had been reduced to something inconsequential. I truly feel God led me to the avvo website and to Nathan's name.

See All Client Reviews

Nathaniel Burney's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Nathaniel
John M. DeProspo headshot
John DeProspo

Criminal defense lawyer | Feb 03

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Attorney Burney is a dedicated, highly-skilled lawyer well-respected within the legal community. I fully endorse him."

Richard W. Levitt headshot
Richard Levitt

Criminal defense lawyer | Jul 18

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Nathan and I recently worked together on a complex criminal antitrust case. His grasp of the issues was superb and his preparation and skillful presentation resulted in the court's rejection of the government's expert testimony in favor of the defense analysis. He was a pleasure to worth with."

Michael Charles Rakower headshot
Michael Rakower

Litigation lawyer | Jul 16

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer's work. Nathan Burney is a talented lawyer who develops excellent rapport with witnesses. He obtains information that others would often fail to get. He has an uncanny ability to find the causal links that bind seemingly random facts into a coherent story. He is a thoughtful lawyer who focuses on his client's best interests."

Don R Berthiaume headshot
Don Berthiaume

White collar crime lawyer | Jul 09

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"Nathaniel is one of the finest courtroom lawyers it has ever been my privilege to see in action. He is poised and is always in control of not only the courtroom itself, but also of his adversaries. I would recommend him to any person who asks and make it a point to include him on any case in which I am working."

View All Endorsements
Eric Turkewitz headshot
Eric Turkewitz

Unknown lawyer

Gordon Mehler headshot
Gordon Mehler

White collar crime lawyer

Michael Z. Gurland headshot
Michael Gurland

White collar crime lawyer

John Warren Moscow headshot
John Moscow

White collar crime lawyer

Michael Paul Bowen headshot
Michael Bowen

White collar crime lawyer

Richard W. Levitt headshot
Richard Levitt

White collar crime lawyer

Michael Charles Rakower headshot
Michael Rakower

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  1.0 (Extreme Caution)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020.

Suspension issued in NY, 2020

updated on 09/08/2021

Suspended means an attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Honors

2017

Rated SuperLawyer, SuperLawyers

2016

Rated SuperLawyer, SuperLawyers

2015

Rated SuperLawyer, SuperLawyers

N/A

Excellence for the Future Award - Advanced Constitutional Law, CALI

Work Experience

2006 - Present

, Criminal Defense Attorney

2002 - 2006

Rackets Bureau - Assistant D.A., Manhattan D.A.

1997 - 2001

Assistant District Attorney, Special Narcotics Prosecutor / Manhattan D.A.

1996 - 1996

Terrorism & Organized Crime Unit - Law Student, U.S. Attorney, Southern District of New York

1995 - 1996

Special Associate, Sidley & Austin

1993 - 1995

Personal Assistant to C.J. Warren Burger (ret), Supreme Court of the United States

Associations

Federal Bar Council

New York City Bar Association, International Law Committee

New York City Bar Association, Uniform State Laws Committee

New York County Lawyers' Association

New York State Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers

Phi Alpha Delta

Sample of Legal Cases

Tax fraud

Not prosecuted

Embezzlement

No jail. No fine.

Procurement Fraud

No jail, No fine

Securities Fraud

Not Prosecuted

See More Legal Cases

Education

1997

Georgetown University Law Center

JD - Juris Doctor

1992

University of Virginia

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2011

Search & Seizure in 60 Minutes Search & Seizure

2011

Insider Trading: What VC and PE Firms Must Do to Avoid Trouble Insider Trading

2010

Hope for Hopeless Cases V: Defending the DNA Case DNA Evidence

2009

Hope for Hopeless Cases IV: Your Client Confessed! Now What? Confessions

2009

Hope for Hopeless Cases III: Better Loss Calculations for Lower Sentences in Financial Crimes White Collar Crime

2009

Hope for Hopeless Cases II: Defending Wiretaps and Tape Recordings Title III Wiretaps and Eavesdropping

2008

Hope for Hopeless Cases I: Defending an Internet Pornography Case Child Pornography

Publications

2011

The Criminal Lawyer The Criminal Lawyer

2008

Inside the Minds: Strategies for Defending Internet Pornography Charges Understanding the Investigative Process to Better Defend Your Client

2007

A Brief Primer on International Law A Brief Primer on International Law

1995

American Criminal Law Review Antitrust Violations

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2020
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution