Nathan Price Chaney

Nathan Price Chaney

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 21 years

Contracts and agreements Lawyer Practice Areas: Contracts & Agreements, Intellectual Property, Health Care

About Nathan

Practice Areas

3

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property 10%

Nathan’s IP practice focuses on trademark, patent, and copyright applications; infringement litigation; technology licensing; branding; trade secret protection; and other IP issues. Nathan's clients range from small business startups to nationwide manufacturers.

10%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Arkansas for 21 years

State: Arkansas

Acquired: 2004

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Texas for 15 years

State: Texas

Acquired: 2010

Not Eligible to Practice - Administrative Suspension

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Nathan Price Chaney's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Nathan Price Chaney's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Nathan

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Top 40 Under 40, National Trial Lawyers

2015

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2014

AV Peer Review Rating, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2014

Top 40 Under 40, National Trial Lawyers

2014

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2013

Outstanding Trial Lawyer Award, Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association

2013

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2013

Top 100 Trial Lawyers, National Trial Lawyers

2013

Top 40 Under 40, National Trial Lawyers

2012

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

2012

Top 40 Under 40, National Trial Lawyers

2011

Outstanding Member - Young Lawyers Division, Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association

2011

Rising Star, Super Lawyers

1994

Boy Scouts of America, Eagle Scout

Work Experience

2016 - Present

Research Contracts Attorney, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences

2009 - 2016

Patent Attorney, Chaney Law Firm, P.A.

2004 - 2009

Patent Attorney, Henry Law Firm, P.A.

1999 - 2001

Legal IT Technician, Graylint Enterprises, Inc.

Associations

2012 - Present

United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Admitted to Practice

2010 - Present

U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

Admitted to Practice

2007 - Present

Arkansas Trial Lawyers Association

2005 - Present

American Association for Justice

2005 - Present

Arkansas Bar Association

2005 - Present

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Admitted to Practice

2005 - Present

U.S. District Court, Eastern and Western Districts of Arkansas

Admitted to Practice

2004 - Present

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Registered Patent Attorney

2013 - 2014

Arkansas Bar Association, Tort Law Section

Chairman

2010 - 2011

Arkansas Bar Association, Tort Law Section

President

2009 - 2013

Clark County Bar Association

President

2004 - 2009

Washington County Bar Association

Sample of Legal Cases

Bradshaw v. FFE Trans. Servs., Inc., 755 F.3d 1104 (8th Cir. 2013)

Plaintiff's verdict affirmed on appeal

Gross & Janes Co. v. Brooks, 2012 Ark. App. 702

Plaintiff's verdict affirmed on appeal

Brown v. Kelton, 2011 Ark. 93

Disqualification of insurance company employee/lawyer affirmed on appeal

Jones v. Walls, N.D. Okla. Case No. 07-cv-107-GKF

Directed verdict on patent invalidity; consent judgment on antitrust counterlcaim

Rotoworks Int’l Ltd. v. Grassworks USA, LLC, W.D. Ark. Case No. 07-cv-5009-JLH

Plaintiff's verdict

Burt v. Farm Bureau, Franklin County, Arkansas Case No. CV-2005-21-1

Summary Judgment for the Plaintiff

See More Legal Cases

Education

2004

Washington and Lee University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2001

University of Arkansas - Fayetteville

Bachelor of Science

N/A

University of Arkansas at Little Rock

MS - Information Science

Speaking Engagements

2017

UAMS continuing medical education

Wearables and Cloud-Based Data Collection in Clinical Trials

2017

Current Legal Issues in Higher Education

Medical Marijuana Update

2013

Personal Injury Seminar

Insurance Bad Faith Law

2012

ATLA Annual Meeting

Countering Low Speed Defenses with Objective Evidence of Injury

2011

Insurance CLE

In-House Insurance Defense Counsel: Unauthorized Practice of Law and Fatal Conflict of Interest

2010

Personal Injury CLE

In-House Insurance Defense Counsel: Permissible Cost Saving Measure or Impermissible Conflict of Interest?

2010

Arkansas Bar Annual Meeting

In-House Insurance Defense Counsel: Permissible Cost Saving Measure or Impermissible Conflict of Interest?

2009

Best of CLE

Digitizing the Modern Law Office

2009

Arkansas Bar Annual Meeting

Digitizing the Modern Law Office

Publications

2014

Arkansas Law Review The Arkansas Deceptive Trade Practices Act: The Arkansas Supreme Court Should Adopt the Specific Conduct Rule

2014

ATLA Docket The Deep Web

2008

South Dakota Law Review A Call to Farms: Diversify the Fuel Supply

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution