No Photo

Katherine A. Young

Retired

About Katherine

Licenses

Licensed in California for 30 years

State: California

Acquired: 1996

Retired

No misconduct found

Licensed in Tennessee for 31 years

State: Tennessee

Acquired: 1995

Retired

No misconduct found


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Experience

Avvo does not rate this lawyer because he or she is retired.

Honors

2020

Top Attorney, Knoxville CityView Magazine

2019

Knoxville Top Attorneys, Cityview Magazine

2018

Knoxville Top Attorneys, CityView Magazine

2017

Top Attorney, CityView Magazine

2016

Top Attorney, CityView Magazine

2015

Top Attorney - Employee Benefits/ERISA, CityView Magazine

2015

Top Attorney - Labor & Employment, Employee, CityView Magazine

2014

Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Top Attorney, CityView Magazine

2013

Top Attorney, CityView Magazine

2012

Top Attorney, CityView Magazine

Work Experience

2011 - Present

Attorney, Young Law Offices, P.C

1995 - 2011

Partner, Montpelier & Young, P.C.

1994 - 2005

Assistant Professor & Adjunct Professor, University of Tennessee at Knoxville

Associations

1996 - Present

Knoxville Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

American Bar Association

Member

1996 - Present

Tennessee Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Roberts-Banks v. Family Dollar of Tennessee, Inc.

Plaintiff prevailed.

TN. Dept. of Transportation v. Lauderdale

Grievant prevailed.

Bowman v. PHP Companies

Plaintiff prevailed after a federal jury trial.

Michael v. Windsor Gardens, et al.

The plaintiff prevailed after a federal jury trial.

Emerson v. Oak Ridge Research Inc.

Plaintiff prevailed at trial and on appeal.

Johnson v. Logo Pros, Inc.

Stipulated Judgment for Plaintiff

Heath v. Michaels Stores, Inc.

Judgement was entered for the Plaintiff in the amount of $17,201, plus Defendant had to pay her attorneys' fees and costs.

Southmayd v. Apria Healthcare, Inc.

Plaintiff prevailed and a federal jury awarded him $368,000. The parties reached a settlement prior to the Court awarding Plaintiff his attorneys' fees and costs in addition to the $368,000 verdict.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1994

California Western School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1980

St Catherine University

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2019

Federal Bench/Bar Conference

Issues in Employment Law

2018

Human Resource Law: What You Need to Know Now

Wage and Benefit Issues

2016

A Practical Guide to Federal Court

Pleadings in Federal Court: Practically Applying the Federal Rules

2016

A Practical Guide to Federal Court

The New Federal Rules

2014

Representing Your Client in Federal Court

Testimony Tactics

2014

Representing Your Client in Federal Court

Developing a Successful Trial Strategy

2013

Administrative Law in Tennessee

Witness Preparation Strategies

2013

Administrative Law in Tennessee

Initial Client Consultation

2013

Administrative Law in Tennessee

Discovery and Evidentiary Issues

2012

Employment Discrimination Law

Whistleblower Claims

2012

Employment Discrimination Law

Retaliation Claims

Publications

1997

Cornell Quarterly Environmental Tobacco Smoke and Employees

1996

Annual Conference for Women in Higher Education Recent Court Decisions On Sexual Harassment

1993

Scholarly Writing The Workplace Fairness Act: A Chance to Balance the Rights of Labor and Management

N/A

CHRIE Annual Conference Wake Up and Smell the Smoke: A Wake-Up Call for the Hospitality Industry

N/A

CHRIE Annual Conference Prevention of Foodborne Illness Liability for Industry Members

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution