Lawyer
OUTCOME: Conviction Affirmed
Rabe appealed a jury verdict of guilty on the offense of resisting arrest, claiming the trial court erred in allowing the arresting officers to testify that, in their opinion, the actions Rabe took aga ... inst them qualified as resisting arrest. The 10th Court of Appeals rejected the argument and affirmed the trial court's decision.
OUTCOME: Conviction affirmed
Appellant argued trial court should have suppressed results of his blood test in a DWI because the officer did not have probable cause to arrest him after Appellant was in a single-vehicle accident, ad ... mitted to drinking, and smelled of alcohol. The 10th Court of Appeals rejected the argument and affirmed the trial court's decision.
OUTCOME: Conviction Affirmed
Appellant argued Court should suppress his blood alcohol level in a DWI case because of evidence presented because Defendant's vehicle was parked less than 100 feet from an intersection and could not h ... ave signaled for more than 100 feet as required by law. Officer did not see where Defendant's vehicle was parked and had reasonable suspicion that an offense had occurred, allowing him to conduct the traffic stop. The 10th Court of Appeals rejected the argument and affirmed the trial court's decision.
OUTCOME: Conviction Affirmed
Appellant argued the jury incorrectly returned a verdict of guilty because the evidence presented did not affirmatively link Appellant to the marijuana found in the vehicle. The 10th Court of Appeals r ... ejected the argument and affirmed the jury's verdict.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
