Tate v. S & M Auto
Mar 24, 2016OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of Tate
Received a $46,000 dollar jury verdict for the consumer, against a used car dealership that sold a used car and failed to disclose the vehicle's prior frame damage.
Lemon law Lawyer
Practice Areas: Lemon Law, Debt Collection
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of Tate
Received a $46,000 dollar jury verdict for the consumer, against a used car dealership that sold a used car and failed to disclose the vehicle's prior frame damage.
OUTCOME: Judgment in favor of Defendant (consumer)
Represented consumer against debt collection company. I was able to quash the summons, vacate the judgement entered against Mr. Polk and reimburse him his funds, which had previously been taken by the ... debt collection company.
OUTCOME: Settlement in favor of Plaintiff