Copyright---Infringement on one, or the collection?
I think what you mean is that you took photographs of a person, registered them as a "collection," and sent copies of all of the photographs to the...
Intellectual property Lawyer
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Trademark Infringement ... +3 more
I think what you mean is that you took photographs of a person, registered them as a "collection," and sent copies of all of the photographs to the...
As noted by Attorney Koslyn, you should hire an attorney to demand removal of your post. The site's "User Policy" prominently discloses to...
Many, many jewelry designs are not copyrightable because they lack sufficient creativity. The Copyright Office has issued a number of rulings that...
No one can answer your question w/o evaluating the language -- and therefore the scope -- of the non-disclosure agreement you signed and the law...
The aphorism "you can't see the forest for the trees" comes to mind. Your problem is NOT with this one other company. Many, many companies...
You very likely did give the company permission by allowing the photographs to be taken for the purpose they're being used, for allowing them to be...
See the responses to a very similar question: http://goo.gl/PAh9F
If you were not the photographer then you're not allowed to publish the photographs on your website. It does not matter that you made the "food...
As ably noted by my colleagues, you have a whole slew of legal issues to tackle before you can start a business that offers consumers an online...
Q: "... is there an "Implied" copyright giving me the ability to use any photo taken of me no matter who was the photographer?" R: NO. The...