Cary Scott Lapidus

Cary Scott Lapidus

also known as Cary Scott LAPIDUS -Retired Inactive Attorney

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 44 years

Lawyer

About Cary

Practice Areas

This attorney has not specified their practice areas.

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 39 years

State: California

Acquired: 1986

Inactive

No misconduct found

Licensed in District of Columbia for 41 years

State: District of Columbia

Acquired: 1984

Administratively Suspended - Non-Payment of Dues

No misconduct found

Licensed in Virginia for 43 years

State: Virginia

Acquired: 1982

Former Member

No misconduct found

Licensed in Massachusetts for 44 years

State: Massachusetts

Acquired: 1981

Retired

No misconduct found

Location

No contact information is available for this lawyer

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Cary Scott Lapidus's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Cary Scott Lapidus's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Cary
Robert S. Banks headshot
Robert Banks

Securities and investment fraud lawyer | Oct 09

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"I endorse this lawyer. Cary and I have worked on several cases as co-counsel, and I consult with him regularly. I value his opinions. He is a very skilled securities attorney. Highly recommended."

View All Endorsements
Darlene D Pasieczny headshot
Darlene Pasieczny

Litigation lawyer

Robert S. Banks headshot
Robert Banks

Litigation lawyer

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2014

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2013

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2013

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2012

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2011

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

2010

Super Lawyer, SuperLawyers

Work Experience

1993 - Present

Attorney, Law Offices of Cary S. Lapidus

1989 - 1993

Attonrey, Lapidus & Reiff

1986 - 1989

Attorney, Taylor & Stanley

1982 - 1986

Enforcement Attorney, Securities & Exchange Commission

Associations

1991 - Present

Public Investors Arbitration Bar Association

Board of Directors - 1995-1999

Sample of Legal Cases

Mitchell v. Murphy Investment

$699,289 Award

Dubois v. Morgan Stanley

$750,000 Award

Kay v. Stone & Youngberg

$750,000 Award

Zeigon v. First Replublic Securities Co.

$870,631 Award

Coutant v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter, et. al.

$1.01 million Award

Teller v. Denison

$1.3 million Award

Breiman v. Round Hill Securities, Inc. et. al.

$1.44 million Award

Pacific Stock Exchange v. Cox Securities, et. al.

$1.54 million Award

Hall v. Morgan Stanley

$1.76 millionAward

Smurzynski v. Kensington Wells, Inc., et. al.

$1.84 million Award

Levinthal v. First Republic Securities Company, LLC

$2.17 million Award

See More Legal Cases

Education

1981

Boston University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1978

University of Virginia

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

N/A

Securities Industry Confernce on Arbitration

Representation of Parties in Arbitrations

N/A

Practising Law Institute - Securities Arbitration Seminar

Should Arbitrators Apply New York Law In Face of New York Choice of Law Provision

N/A

NASD Fall Conference

Punitive Damages in Arbitration

N/A

NASD Conference

Damages in Arbitration - Arbitrator's Duty to Follow the Law

N/A

BASF Speaker Series

The Availability of Punitive Damages in Securities Arbitrations

N/A

American Arbitration Association Conference

Evidence and Persuasion in Securities Arbitrations

Publications

N/A

Practising Law Institute Securities Arbitration Handbook Should Arbitrators Apply New York Law In Face of New York Choice of Law Provision

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution