Gary R. Stenzel

Gary R. Stenzel

4.7
Rating: 9.3

Licensed for 38 years

Divorce and separation Lawyer at Spokane, WA
Practice Areas: Divorce & Separation, Child Custody, Family ... +2 more

421 West Riverside Ave., Suite 216, Spokane, WA

About Gary

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 38 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1987

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Gary R. Stenzel P.S.

421 West Riverside Ave., Suite 216, Spokane, WA, 99201

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Gary R. Stenzel's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

7 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (7) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | Compassion

Posted by Andre | December 29, 2010 | Divorce & Separation

Nice Man Who Won't Screw You Over To Make A Buck

I went into Mr. Stenzel's office for a consultation for a divorce. I don't have a lot of money since I just started my new job a few months ago and the wife is draining my money faster than I can earn it. Mr. Stenzel told me how much his services would cost and then, realizing that I could not pay th...at much, he showed me what I would need to do to take care of things on my own. He was good to talk to and he is very good at keeping you calm on on track. I would recommend that you at least give him a try by having a consultation with him.

See All Client Reviews

Gary R. Stenzel's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Gary
Charles E. Rohr JR headshot
Charles Rohr

Family lawyer | Nov 25

Relationship: Fellow lawyer in community

"As a former judge I can say without hesitation that Gary is one of the premier, top notch family law attorneys in the area. He has compassion for his clients and a rock solid grasp of the the law."

View All Endorsements
Charles E. Rohr JR headshot
Charles Rohr

Criminal defense lawyer

Experience

Rating:  9.3 (Superb)

Honors

2020

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2019

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

Distinguished, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

America's Most Honored Professionals, American Registry

2016

Top Lawyers in Washington State, Legal Network

2015

Client Distinction Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Client Distinction Award, Martindale-Hubbell

2007

Top Family Law Firm, Fairchild Air Force Base Newspaper, "Connections"

2005

Pro Bono Attorney of the Year, Spokane County Bar Association

2000

Top Family Law Firm, Fairchild Air Force Base Newspaper, "Connections"

1999

Top Family Law Firm, Fairchild Air Force Base Newspaper, "Connections"

1998

Top Family Law Firm, Fairchild Air Force Base Newspaper, "Connections"

1996

Top Family Law Firm, Fairchild Air Force Base Newspaper, "Connections"

N/A

Pro Bono Attorney of the Year, Spokane County Bar Association

Work Experience

1993 - Present

Lead Attorney/Owner, Stenzel Law Office

1987 - 1993

Priciple Partner, Underwood, Campbell, Brock & Cerutti; Stenzel & Price Attorneys at Law; & Stenzel Law Office

Associations

Spokane County Bar Association

Member

Washington State Bar Association

Member

1977 - 1977

BYU Family Law Graduate Students Association

President

Sample of Legal Cases

In re Marriage of Dorland 34987-0-III (Wash.App. Div 3 (2019)

Husband's appeal of maintenance denied

In re Marriage of Ruddick, 35416-4-III (Wash.App. Div 3 2018)

Won and remanded for ruling consistent with findings

In re ALD 363 P.3d 604, 191 Wn.App. 474 (Wash.App. Div. 3 2015)

Won custody back for mother

In re Parenting Plan of Hall, 339 P.3d 178 (Wash.App. Div. 3 2014)

Both orders dismissing the Petitions were vacated, judge taken off

In re Parentage of C.M.F., 179 Wn.2d 411 (2013)

Won the case, the trial's ruling overturned and remanded

In re Custody of S.R., 334 P.3d 1190 (Wash.App. Div. 3 2014)

Won child given back to mother

In re the Custody of S.C.D.-L. 170 Wn.2d 513 (2010)

Successful

Long v. Fregeau, 244 P.3d 26 (2010)

Successful defense

In re Custody of Shields,157 Wn.2d 126 (2006)

Successful - overturned trial & appeals court ruling

Marriage of Dicus, In re 110 Wn.App. 347 (2002)

Successful + Fees

Marriage of Moore, In re, 99 Wn.App. 144 (1999);

6 figures + fees

In re Matter of J.E. Shelly Finch et ux v. R. Maling, directed decision (2012)

Remanded for new hearing

See More Legal Cases

Education

1986

Gonzaga University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1977

Brigham Young University

M.S.

1973

Brigham Young University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2016

Finding Hidden Income & Assets in Divorce Cases

Finding Hidden Income & Assets in Divorce Cases

2015

End of the Year Family Law CLE

Synopsis of New Appeal Decisions

2014

Serving Up Family Law

Report of Recent Appeals Cases

2013

Family Law Litigator's Point of View

Family Law Litigator's Point of View

2012

Evidence & Expert Testimony Best Practices

Supporting Your Case

2010

Handling Valuation Issues in Divorce

Handling Valuation Issues in Divorce

2009

Family Law A to Z

Family Law A to Z

2008

Preventing Critical Financial Mistakes during Divorces

Preventing Critical Financial Mistakes during Divorces

2008

Ethical Issues in Representing Family Law Clients

Ethical Issues in Representing Family Law Clients

2006

Year End Potpourri

Year End Potpourri

2005

Getting the Best Financial Settlement for your Divorce Client in WA

Getting the Best Financial Settlement for your Divorce Client in WA

2004

Handling Washington Divorce Cases Start to Finish

Handling Washington Divorce Cases Start to Finish

2004

Complex Issues in Divorce for the WA Practitioner

Complex Issues in Divorce for the WA Practitioner

2000

Ethics in Family Law

Ethics in Family Law

1995

Guide to COBRA Laws

Guide to COBRA Laws

Publications

2016

National Business Institute Seminar Finding Hidden Income & Assets in Divorce Cases

2015

National Business Institute Seminar Synopsis of New Appeal Decisions

2014

National Business Institute Seminar Report of Recent Appeals Cases

2012

National Business Institute Seminar Evidence & Expert Testimony Best Practices: Supporting your Case

2010

National Business Institute Seminar Handling Valuation Issues in Divorce

2009

National Business Institute Seminar Family Law A to Z

2008

National Business Institute Seminar Preventing Critical Financial Mistakes during Divorces

2005

National Business Institute Seminar Getting the Best Financial Settlement for your Divorce Client in WA

2004

National Business Institute Seminar Handling Washington Divorce Cases Start to Finish

2004

National Business Institute Seminar Complex Issues in Divorce for the WA Practitioner

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution