Kevin A Rosenfield

Kevin A Rosenfield

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 7.9

Licensed for 21 years

Litigation Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Litigation, Construction & Development, Government Contracts, General Practice

2001 Sixth Avenue, Suite 3420, Seattle, WA

About Kevin

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 21 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 2004

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in Oregon for 15 years

State: Oregon

Acquired: 2011

Resigned

No misconduct found

Location

Jackson Rosenfield LLP

2001 Sixth Avenue, Suite 3420, Seattle, WA, 98121

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kevin A Rosenfield's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Kevin A Rosenfield's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kevin

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  7.9 (Very Good)

Honors

2015

Super Lawyer, Washington Super Lawyers Magazine

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Partner, Jackson Rosenfield LLP

2009 - 2013

Attorney, Ball Janik LLP

2003 - 2009

Attorney, K & L Gates

Associations

2011 - Present

Oregon State Bar

Member

2003 - Present

Washington State Bar Association

Member

2005 - 2008

Multiple Sclerosis Association of King County

Board of Directors

Sample of Legal Cases

•Comark Building Solutions v. Alutiiq International Solutions

Prevailed at arbitration

•Nippo-IBC v. AMEC Environmental

Pending

•Southwestern Industrial Contractors v. Alutiiq International Solutions

Settled

•ERG Transit Systems, Inc. v. Clever Devices Ltd

Settled

•HomeStreet Bank v. Norris

Prevailed on summary judgment.

Star Technologies Corp. v. Andrews Space, Inc.

Settled

See More Legal Cases

Education

2003

Northwestern University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2000

University of Michigan

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Publications

2011

Construction Briefings “Risk Allocation in Federal Construction: Reconciling the Miller Act and Contract Disputes Act With Subcontract Drafting and Administration"

2011

Government Contracts Newsletter "Dealing with Touhy: Compelling Non-Party Deposition Testimony from a Government Agent"

2011

Government Contracts Newsletter "Subcontractor Disputes and Attorney Fee Clauses: Who is the Prevailing Party?"

2006

Construction Briefings "Rethinking Abuse of Discretion Claims"

2003

Northwestern University Law Review "Brown v. Armenti and the First Amendment Protection of Teachers and Professors in Grading Their Students"

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution