Elaine Louise Spencer

Elaine Louise Spencer

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 8.4

Licensed for 49 years

Land use and zoning Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Land Use & Zoning, Litigation, Environmental and Natural Resources

Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 300, Seattle, WA

About Elaine

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in Washington for 49 years

State: Washington

Acquired: 1976

Emeritus

No misconduct found

Location

Graham & Dunn PC

Pier 70, 2801 Alaskan Way, Suite 300, Seattle, WA, 98121-1128

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Elaine Louise Spencer's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Elaine Louise Spencer's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Elaine

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Alison Moss headshot
Alison Moss

Land use and zoning lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.4 (Excellent)

Honors

2009

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2008

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2007

Super Lawyer, Washington Law & Politics Magazine

2006

Super Lawyer,

2005

Super Lawyer,

2004

Super Lawyer,

Associations

Washington State Bar Association

Member

American Bar Association

Member

Building Industry Association of Washington

Legal Trust Committee Member

Washington Forest Protection Association

Legal Committee Member

Education

1976

Yale Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1971

Iowa State University

BS - Bachelor of Science

Publications

2008

N/A Damages Claims: An Update on Fifth Amendment and Due Process Issues

2008

N/A The ESA and the New Spotted Owl Litigation in Washington: When a Blunt Instrument Simply Isn’t an Appropriate Tool

2006

N/A Use and Misuse of Technical Data: Telling the Scientific Story to Scientific Virgins

2005

Unknown Update on the Law of Regulatory Takings

2005

Unknown Forest Practices and the Non-Industrial Landowner in a Post-GMA, Post-Forest & Fish, Post-RMAP World

2004

Unknown Can We Have Growth Management and Traffic Concurrency

2004

Unknown King County Eases Rules in Rural And Agricultural Areas to Encourage Wineries and Breweries

2003

Unknown Ripeness and Jurisdiction: When Can You Bring a Regulatory Takings Claim?

2003

Unknown Wetlands and the Agricultural Community Wither Boren Ranch?

2002

Unknown New Challenges to Growth Management Act Compliance Possible After September 2002

2002

N/A Congress Promotes ‘Brownfields’ Redevelopment

2000

Unknown The Federalization of Land Use Regulation: The 4(d) Rule for Threatened and Endangered Salmon, and NPDES Permits for Non-point Source Pollution

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution