Laughing Gas Enterprises v. Anheuser-Busch, et al.
Dec 05, 2011OUTCOME: Several favorable settlements
Represented technology start-up company in patent infringement case in the mobile device industry.
Seattle, WA
Intellectual property Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Copyright Infringement ... +2 more
OUTCOME: Several favorable settlements
Represented technology start-up company in patent infringement case in the mobile device industry.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of client for all unpaid royalties
We represented Fusion Technologies, who was sued by Trade Associates to avoid a royalty agreement and to recover royalties paid to Fusion under the royalty agreement. Trade Associates alleged that Fus ... ion fraudulently induced Trade Associates to enter into the royalty agreement by misrepresenting the inventorship of Fusion's patent.
OUTCOME: Settled
Intellectual property case against manufacturer of computer components for infringing client's patent.
OUTCOME: Favorable Settlement
Defending trademark infringement claim against client by regional automotive dealerships.
OUTCOME: Case dismissed against client
Represented small Internet company in patent infringement suit brought by company owned by wealthy technology entrepreneur.
OUTCOME: Settled.
Defended start-up company sued for patent infringement by large, publicly traded company. Had the complaint dismissed at pleadings stage. Later settled the dispute.
OUTCOME: Ongoing
Professional photographer sued Apple for unauthorized use of her photograph in an iPhone commercial. The commercial was used to promote the iPhone and the release of a band's second album.
OUTCOME: Settled
Copyright infringement case against Apple and Mitch Waite Group for improper use of client's recordings. The recordings were used by Mitch Waite Group in its iPhone application, and by Apple in its na ... tional television advertising for the iPhone.
OUTCOME: Settled
Infringement case brought by document management software company against several companies infringing on client's patent. Resolved dispute favorably with all defendants.
OUTCOME: Settled with all defendants
Our client, a web-based technology company, sued several other competing companies in the industry for patent infringement. Case proceeded through Markman hearing at which our client's proposed constr ... uctions were adopted verbatim. Remaining defendants settled immediately after claim construction decision.