Seattle, WA
Insurance Lawyer at Seattle, WA
Practice Areas: Insurance, Commercial, Debt Collection
OUTCOME: Ruling in favor of client at Supreme Court.
Insured made a first party earthquake claim, alleging bad faith claims handling. I represented Mutual of Enumclaw in the Court of Appeals, which ruled in favor of my client on all points. MacDonald a ... sked the Washington Supreme Court to set aside the appellate ruling, but the Supreme Court declined to do so.
OUTCOME: Appellate ruling in favor of client.
Insured demanded coverage that was not provided by its policy. The Court of Appeals agreed with the Trial Court's dismissal of insured's allegations.
OUTCOME: Judgment in client's favor
Federal District Court ruling that several insurers could not evade their duty to defend their insured on the basis of an "ongoing operations" clause in their policies.
OUTCOME: Forced insurer to provide coverage.
Hartford wrongfully denied Australia Unlimited's tender of defense when sued by Crocs, Inc. I obtained a jury verdict of $3.86 million, which included unpaid attorney fees and lost profits.
OUTCOME: Client was entitled to enforce contract.
The Washington State Supreme Court ruled that my client was entitled to enforce exclusions in insurance policy, and was not estopped from denying coverage. Trial Court's judgment against my client for ... $3 million was reversed.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
