Bellevue, WA
Personal injury Lawyer at Bellevue, WA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Civil Rights, Criminal Defense
OUTCOME: Settled for $1,150,000.
Subcontractor employee hired to clean a century-old water tower suffered severe injuries when he fell through the roof of the water tower owned by Yakima County. Suit filed in federal court. Co-counsel ... with D'Amore Law Group of Portland, Oregon.
OUTCOME: 350,000 settlement.
Minor sexually assaulted by residents at boarding school in Indian Country.
OUTCOME: Settled for almost $500,000.
Adult woman sued the Yakima Diocese for sexual abuse she suffered as a child at the hands of a priest. With Tamaki Law lead, co-counsel Bryan Smith, successfully settled the woman's claims for close to ... $500,000.
OUTCOME: Settled for $100,000.
Front end collision resulting in three herniated discs and soft tissue damage.
OUTCOME: Not guilty jury verdict.
I was trial Counsel. This was a jury trial where the client was accused of sexual assault. After a nine day trial, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
OUTCOME: Indictment dismissed against client.
I was trial counsel for one defendant in a multi-defendant, white collar, water district indictment filed in the Federal District Court for the District of Nevada. After extensive pretrial motions, th ... e Government dismissed all charges against my client.
OUTCOME: Won at trial and won at the Ninth circuit Court of Appeals when government appealed.
I was trial counsel. As a matter of first impression, warrantless searches, including drug testing, imposed as a condition of pretrial release, required showing of probable cause, despite defendant's p ... re-release consent. Court granted motion to suppress.
OUTCOME: Jury verdict in favor of my client.
In an almost unwinable case, a client charged with illegal reentry by a deported alien a jury returned a verdict of not guilty.
OUTCOME: Won on appeal.
I was trial counsel. The case involved a search of a converted hotel room. The District Court denied the defendant’s motion to suppress. The Ninth Circuit reversed in a published opinion holding that ... “police officers may only gain visual access to a hotel room if (1) the room’s occupant voluntarily opens the hotel door in response to a request (not a threat or a command), (2) the officers have a warrant, or (3) the officers have probable cause and one of the exceptions to the warrant requirement exists.”
OUTCOME: Won on appeal.
I was trial counsel. The case involved a complex Fourth and Fifth Amendment motion to suppress. The District Court denied the motion to suppress. The Ninth Circuit reversed in a published opinion h ... olding that an overnight guest in an apartment has an expectation of privacy in belongings located therein.
Ad
Transform legal challenges into solutions.
Connect now to review your situation.
