Medford, OR
Criminal defense Lawyer at Medford, OR
Practice Areas: Criminal Defense, DUI & DWI, Sex Crime
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
My client was accused of hitting a car and fleeing the scene - supposedly screeching his tires to get away and having a matching mark on his car. The jury found him not guilty after cross-examination o ... f the witnesses.
OUTCOME: Acquittal - Not Guilty
My client was accused of violating a child support order. After a showing to the judge that my client was dealing with health issues and was parenting the children more than the original agreement was ... envisioned, my client was acquitted.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty
This was my first solo jury trial in 2008. My client was charged with reckless driving for allegedly throwing something out his window and hitting the car behind him after a road rage incident. After i ... mpeachment, it became clear that the "investigation" into the damage was really just a phone call and a fax.
OUTCOME: Not Guilty of Murder - Convicted of a Lesser Charge
My very first jury trial was one in which I sat second chair on a murder case. After great investigation by Pat Marshall, amazing trial work by my colleague Rebecca Levy, and some moxie, we managed to ... achieve a not guilty on the murder charge - a not guilty on the manslaughter in the first degree charge - and the jury found our client guilty of manslaughter in the second degree.
OUTCOME: Reversed and Remanded - Dismissed Upon Appeal
"Defendant appeals from a judgment revoking his probation, arguing that the trial court erred in denying his motion to exclude hearsay evidence offered through his probation officer on the ground that ... the admission of that evidence violated his due process right to confront witnesses. State v. Johnson, 221 Or App 394, 190 P3d 455, rev den, 345 Or 418 (2008). We agree with defendant, and reverse and remand." I was trial counsel.
OUTCOME: Evidence Suppressed - Case Dismissed
My client was charged with Criminal Mistreatment, a person-to-person felony, after an intrusive DHS worker and officer went to perform a welfare check on her home. After I filed a motion to exclude the ... evidence based on the fact that my client's constitutional right to exclude the officer and worker from her home were not protected and a contested hearing, the evidence was suppressed and the case dismissed.