State v. 2nd DUI Offender
Jan 01, 2011OUTCOME: Dismissed with prejudice
Motion to Suppress granted where 911 caller did not have requisite firsthand knowledge of driving. This was in a case with a .26 breath test
Honolulu, HI
Civil rights Lawyer at Honolulu, HI
Practice Areas: Civil Rights, Consumer Protection ... +7 more
OUTCOME: Dismissed with prejudice
Motion to Suppress granted where 911 caller did not have requisite firsthand knowledge of driving. This was in a case with a .26 breath test
OUTCOME: Dismissed
3 Separate DUI's thrown out as a result of State wrongfully alleging that it had not received discovery requests.
OUTCOME: Plaintiff prevailed in the Ninth Circuit - still pending
Landmark gun rights case where Plaintiff sued the City for Second Amendment claims over refusal to issue a conceal and carry permit. Plaintiff prevailed in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals
OUTCOME: Dismissed with prejudice
2nd Offense DUI dismissed with prejudice following State discovery violations
OUTCOME: Dismissed with prejudice
Motion to Suppress granted where State failed to prove proper media notice regarding DUI roadblock. Mr. Holcomb had all evidence suppressed following the roadblock seizure, and the State had no choice ... but to dismiss with prejudice.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
DUI dismissed for international student where Mr. Holcomb persuaded court to sanction State for failing to comply with motions deadlines
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Vehicular accident where defendant was unconscious and taken to the hospital - dismissed
OUTCOME: Convicted of Lesser Charge
Defendant Charged as a highly intoxicated driver. After trial, judge found State did not prove that Defendant was a highly intoxicated driver. The result was a three month suspension (with possiblity ... of a conditional license permit) instead of a six month absolute suspension.
OUTCOME: Dismissed
Defendant was charged after a major traffic collision on H-1. Defendant was unconscious and taken to hospital where blood was drawn. Defendant felt his case was hopeless and wanted to plead guilty.
OUTCOME: Mr. Holcomb has drafted and filed the briefing in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals challenging denial of preliminary injunction.
This is a landmark case spearheaded by Mr. Holcomb in which a conceal and carry permit is sought on behalf of a fit and otherwise qualified applicant. This case will change the law in Hawaii and advan ... ce civil rights throughout the nation.