John Anthony Lawrence

John Anthony Lawrence

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 9.8

Licensed for 49 years

Business Lawyer at Chico, CA
Practice Areas: Business, Antitrust & Trade Law, Employment & Labor ... +3 more

1425 Oleander Avenue, Chico, CA

This attorney is currently not accepting new clients.
Reason: Not Practicing

About John

Practice Areas

6

Practice Areas

Business 40%

Business Litigation of all types

50 years

40%
Antitrust and Trade Law 20%

All aspects of competitive business disputes

50 years

20%
Employment and Labor 20%

Traditional labor law; employment law; administrative and regulatory; DOL, DFEH, OSHA, NLRB, EEOC, all state and federal agencies

50 years

20%
Administrative Law 10%

Regulatory, business related tax issues,

50 years

10%
Class Action 5%

Employment and antitrust

50 years

5%
Contracts and Agreements 5%

General practice

50 years

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 49 years

State: California

Acquired: 1976

Inactive

No misconduct found

Location

Law Offices of John Anthony Lawrence

1425 Oleander Avenue, Chico, CA, 95926

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

John Anthony Lawrence's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

John Anthony Lawrence's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse John

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.8 (Superb)

Honors

2017

AV Preeminent 5.0 out of 5 Peer Review Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent Rated - Judicial Edition, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent Rated - Labor and Employment Law, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent Rated - Business Law, Martindale-Hubbell

2016

AV Preeminent Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

2015

Top Rated Lawyer - Labor and Employment Law, Martindale-Hubbell

2014

Top Rated Lawyer - Labor and Employment Law, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Top Rated Lawyer - Labor and Employment, Martindale-Hubbell

2013

Southern California Top Rated Lawyer - Commercial Litigation, Law.com/LA Times/Martindale Hubbell

2012

Top Rated Lawyer - Labor and Employment Law, Martindale-Hubbell

2011

Southern California Superlawyer 2011, Superlawyers

2010

Southern California Superlawyer 2010, Superlawyers

2009

Southern California Superlawyer 2009, Superlawyers

2007

Top California Verdicts of 2006 - No. 7, Los Angeles Daily Journal

2007

Top 100 Jury Verdict of 2006 (No. 81), Verdict Search

2006

Award of Meritorious Service, Consumer Attorneys of California

1992

AV Rated, Martindale-Hubbell

1974

Degarmo Award Scholarship, UCLA School of Law

Work Experience

2004 - 2017

Founding and Managing Partner, Dongell Lawrence Finney LLP

2000 - 2004

Managing Partner, Radcliff Dongell Lawrence LLP

1988 - 2000

Founding Partner, Richman, Lawrence, Mann, Chizever & Phillips

1981 - 1988

Partner, Rudin, Richman & Appel

1974 - 1981

law clerk/associate/partner, Richman & Herman

Associations

1976 - Present

State Bar of California

Member

2001 - 2015

Foundation for Excellence in Education dba Children's Community School

Member/Treasurer - Board of Directors

1988 - 2002

The Buckley School

Member/Vice-Chairman/Emeritus - Board of Trustees

1977 - 2017

Los Angeles County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

Tuolumne Jobs & Small Business Alliance v. S.C. (WalMart Stores, Inc.)

Affirmed/adverse - 2014 DJDAR 10503

Gordon & Holmes v. Courtney Love

Obtained a complete defense jury verdict for Mrs. Cobain rejecting claim for $8M and punitive damages; motion for new trial denied.

Voggenthaler v. Maryland Square LLC

Partially affirmed and partially reversed

Fred Kayne v. Raphael Mense; Cottonsmith LLC

Obtained Jury Verdict over $4.2 Million, with penalties and punitive damages of $750,000. Final judgment exceeded $5.3 Million, including attorney fees, costs and expert fees. The Jury unanimously rejected outright defendants' $25 Million cross-claim.

Lamour Nail Products, Inc. adv. Lamoon, Inc.

Obtained a complete defense Judgment after 6 day court trial in Orange County Superior Court, Judge James DeSimone presiding.

Pasmino & Duarte v. Hyung Sung Investment Properties

Defense Judgment

Salmon v. Fuqua

Award of attorney fees incurred

Accuride International Inc. v. NMTC Inc. dba Matco Tools

Obtained a $1,508,000 settlement to Accuride

Richman v. Rideout Memorial Hospital

Obtained a unanimous $24.2 Million Jury Verdict for Plaintiffs after a 6 week jury trial in Yuba County, California.

Register v. Prudhomme

Successfully reversed adverse probate trial court decision

Nixon v. 2K Sounds, Inc.

Defense Judgment

Graham-Werstien Marketing v. Graham, et al.

Settlement for $112,000 to Plaintiff

Alex Trebek v. Pizante

Judgment for Plaintiff, Trebek

Marvel Productions Ltd. v. State Board of Equalization

Judgment for Plaintiff, Marvel Productions

Kodak v. PIC, Sid Lane

Jury verdict on cross-claim against Kodak

Berman v. Marks

Jury verdict for plaintiff for $60,000 against prior demand of $300,000

Tahbaz v. G.I. Industries

Judgment for plaintiff

Karat, Inc. dba Stardust Hotel v. Nevada Gaming Control Board

Recovery of over $2,000,000 in overpaid taxes

County of San Diego v. Sagon Penn, Fries Entertainment

Defense Judgment

Houseton v. Nimmo

Wrote appellate briefing on successful appeal of adverse EEOC decision through successful Supreme Court review

Majeski v. Balcor Entertainment Co.

Successfully represented New World Entertainment through dismissal of securities claims against it, among other film packagers

Local Joint Executive Board of Las Vegas, Culinary Workers Local 226 v. Royal Center, Inc.

After obtaining summary reversal for reconsideration before the United States Supreme Court, ultimately prevailed in arbitration over successorship bargaining at Las Vegas hotel

Hemdale Home Video v. Oak Prods

Trans-World International, Inc. v. Smith-Hemion Productions

Obtained $2.6 Million jury verdict against Jackson Productions, ultimately resulted in mistrial on inability of jury to allocate between defendants

Eckstein v. Balcor Film Investors

Successfully represented New World Entertainment through dismissal of securities claims against it, among other film packagers

NLRB v. Aladdin Hotel Corp.

On appeal, prevailed in the 9th Circuit's refusal to enforce adverse decision of National Labor Relations Board against our client - the Aladdin Hotel

Gault v. United States Bobsled & Skeleton Federation

On emergency appeal obtained a complete reversal of trial court's order enjoining enforcement of an arbitration decision thus successfully allowing our clients to participate in Olympic trials for the 1992 Winter Olympics

Sinatra v. National Enquirer, Inc.

Before the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, successfully obtained affirmance of award against Swiss clinic which had unlawfully misappropriated Mr. Sinatra's name and likeness

Jarrow Formulas, Inc. v. Nutrition Now, Inc.

Defeated our client's competitor's claims of false advertising at the trial court level, affirmed by the Ninth Circuit. Supreme Court declined review.

See More Legal Cases

Education

1976

University of California at Los Angeles School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1973

Occidental College

BA - Bachelor of Arts

1969

Bishop Amat Memorial High School

Speaking Engagements

2007

Legal and Banking Rights

Labor and Employment Issues for Business Owners

2007

Annual Award Luncheon

Retaliation against Whistle Blowing Doctors

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution