Gunning v. Doe
May 04, 2017OUTCOME: Judgment Affirmed
In August 2013, Marie Gunning brought suit in the Superior Court against the anonymous publisher and writer(s) (collectively John Doe) of News as Viewed From a Crow's Nest (Crow's Nest), a publication ... distributed locally in Freeport, Maine, and accessible on the Internet, which Gunning claimed had published defamatory statements about her in several of its issues. After a California court quashed a subpoena that Gunning served on the Crow's Nest's website host seeking to identify Doe, the Superior Court dismissed her complaint for failure to effect service on the defendants. Gunning appealed from that judgment. The publisher of the Crow's Nest (Doe #1) cross-appeals, agreeing with the court that Gunning is estopped by the California judgment from continuing to seek the Does' identities, and additionally contending that Gunning cannot force the Does to reveal their identities because the Crow's Nest is both nonactionable constitutionally protected parody and protected anonymous speech. On appeal, the Court concluded that Gunning could not re-litigate the issues decided in California and affirmed the dismissal of her claims.
