Kanika Rani Radhakrishnan

Kanika Rani Radhakrishnan

4.7
Rating: 6.5

Licensed for 25 years

Patent application Lawyer at San Jose, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Application, Trademark Application, Copyright Application

2570 N. First Street, Ste 200, San Jose, CA

About Kanika

Biography

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 25 years

State: California

Acquired: 2000

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Evergreen Valley Law Group

2570 N. First Street, Ste 200, San Jose, CA, 95131

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Kanika Rani Radhakrishnan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

4.7 /5.0

29 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (29) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 6 - 9 of 9 reviews | Recommendation

Posted by Daniel | June 01, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Trademark Application

Outstanding Job on Trademark Registration

We just want to thank Kanika and her paralegal team for the amazing success on approving our registered trademark. This was a special case as our name has been opposed several times by a prestigious brand in social media space. We have decided to work with our legal team all angles of keeping our na...me and they are were diligent in sending back the right answers, advising in negotiation of legal position and ultimately bring this application to a registered trademark. We are very happy with the results and are happy to also continue our work on patent registration with this team.

Posted by Raja | March 23, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Patent Application

Excellent work in filing our provisional patent

We are thrilled with Kanika and her team’s work in filing our provisional software patent. When we contacted Kanika out of the blue, she was super responsive and gave us sound advice on how to proceed to file our provisional patent. She clearly outlined the process and caveats. Once we signed u...p, we sent a complex long document as our draft. They essentially rewrote it in patent legalese, reviewed it with us in a few iterations to converge quickly. They followed up to ensure timely closure and responded promptly to our questions. They ensured that our filing was of high quality. I got several patents issued in my previous role. I have to say that their reworked documents and process are top notch.

Posted by anonymous | February 12, 2022 | Hired Attorney | Patent Application

My Patent got approved

This was my first ever patent filing and it got approved. Kanika guided and represented me through whole process very patiently until it got approved. Her patent drafting skills are excellent. She drafted my ideas in excellent way. Her work with me in overcoming rejections was remarkable. She know...ledgeable about technical subjects. She works hard and understands the subject well and drafts it very smartly and makes sure that idea is represented in its completeness. She was very accommodative to include my evolving ideas while working on this. Thank you Kanika. Currently I am working with her for 2 other filings.

Posted by Adarsh | January 04, 2021 | Hired Attorney | Patent Application

Wasted time and money

I was upbeat when I started working with Kanika in 2015 for my software patent. However, fast forward almost 6 years and after spending way over $10k I had to withdraw the patent application as Kanika could not successfully negotiate with the patent examiner. Action after action after action after a...ction from the examiner and her office kept sending me the examiner's action notice and invoice with no explanation whatsoever in laymen's language. Each action cost me hundreds and hundreds of dollars and somehow Kanika or her liason/office were not able to convince the examiner. I often got the impression that my patent was not being handled by Kanika personally but by some third party sub-contracted junior attorney or an intern in her office. I finally had no choice but to cut my losses and withdraw the patent application. I would not recommend Kanika for a software patent.

Kanika Radhakrishnan

Replied last January 04, 2021

Dear Adarsh, Thanks for using our Firm.  Please recall that you have met with our Of Counsel who is not a junior or an intern or a third-party by any means.  Far from expressing any reservations after the meeting, you had posted a five-star review for me, and my team on UpCounsel.  As your application went through prosecution, please recall that our firm heavily discounted our service charges for Office Action responses since we were very sensitive to your situation. Our firm's success rate in obtaining patents is 82-85%.  Please let us know if there is anything else we can help you with.

See All Client Reviews

Kanika Rani Radhakrishnan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Kanika

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.5 (Good)

Honors

1996

British Chevening, Commonwealth

Work Experience

2004 - Present

Managing Partner, Evergreen Valley Law Group

2001 - 2002

Associate, Morrison & Foerster

Associations

2014 - Present

South Asian Bar Association of Northern California

Attorney Member

Education

1997

University of Warwick

LLM

N/A

Harvard University Law School

Speaking Engagements

2005

CIP Forum 2005

US case law

Languages

German

Hindi

Tamil

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution