Andrew Timothy Oliver

Andrew Timothy Oliver

5.0
Rating: 9.6

Licensed for 24 years

Patent infringement Lawyer at San Jose, CA
Practice Areas: Patent Infringement, Patent Application, Intellectual Property ... +2 more

160 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 975, San Jose, CA

About Andrew

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Patent Infringement 50%

26 years | 50 cases

50%
Intellectual Property 10%

26 years | 15 cases

10%
Litigation 5%

26 years | 50 cases

5%
Mergers and Acquisitions 5%

20 years | 4 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check
  • Credit Card

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 24 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2001

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Amin, Turocy & Watson, LLP

160 W. Santa Clara St., Suite 975, San Jose, CA, 95113

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Andrew Timothy Oliver's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews | Practice Area Knowledge

Posted by Tae Bum | June 15, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Patent Infringement

Strong legal and technical skills that resulted in excellent work.

My company, a Fortune 200 biotech company, hired Andrew not only for his specialized expertise in both patent litigation and patent procurement, but also for his advanced technical knowledge. After retaining him, Andrew quickly and thoroughly grasped our complex technology that combined life sciences..., engineering, and material sciences. He then analyzed multiple competitor patents and evaluated their potential impact on this technology. We were pleased when Andrew provided us with clear, detailed, and useful opinions on these patents, thus providing guidance for our future research and business efforts. Importantly, Andrew delivered these opinions within a tight budget and time-frame, all without compromising quality. As in-house counsel, I was Andrew’s primary client for this matter. I believe Andrew’s experience, skill, and knowledge, both in the technical and legal domains, were critical in delivering this high quality of work product. Moreover, Andrew was able to work seamlessly with members of the legal team at various levels, as well as with the responsible business executive. Our team was very impressed with Andrew’s work, and I would unequivocally recommend Andrew to others for all manner of patent-related work.

Posted by Shane | June 07, 2016 | Intellectual Property

Excellent intellectual property litigator

I worked with Andrew on patent litigation defending several large well-known companies. I found Andrew’s work to be efficient and effective. Plus, he is a pleasure to work with. Now, I am in-house intellectual property counsel. I have recommended that we hire Andrew for at least one litigation ma...tter and would not hesitate to recommend him to my company or other companies looking to hire an intellectual property litigator.

See All Client Reviews

Andrew Timothy Oliver's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Andrew
John E. Lord headshot
John Lord

Patent application lawyer | May 22

Relationship: Co-worker

"Andrew and I worked at the same firm on patent litigation for a number years. Andrew is a highly skilled patent lawyer and a consummate professional. I remember him coming up with novel legal theories and strategies that most lawyers would miss. He also has an approachable personality that makes him easy to work with. I endorse Andrew and would be glad to recommend him to individuals and companies looking for a patent attorney."

View All Endorsements

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  9.6 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Super Lawyer 2015 - Intellectual Property, Super Lawyers Magazine

2014

Northern California Rising Stars 2014, Super Lawyers Magazine

2014

Sapphire Award for pro bono services, Out of Egypt Network

2013

Northern California Rising Stars 2013, Super Lawyers Magazine

2012

Northern California Rising Stars 2012, Super Lawyers Magazine

2011

Northern California Rising Stars 2011, Super Lawyers Magazine

2010

Northern California Rising Stars 2010, Super Lawyers Magazine

Work Experience

2012 - Present

Partner, Amin, Turocy & Watson LLP

2008 - 2012

Special Counsel, Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP (through merger with Townsend & Townsend & Crew LLP)

2000 - 2008

Associate, Ropes & Gray LLP (through merger with Fish & Neave LLP)

1999 - 1999

Summer Associate, Fish & Neave LLP

1996 - 1999

Software Engineer then Consultant, Hughes Missile Systems Company

Associations

2016 - 2018

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

President

2014 - 2016

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

Vice President

2012 - 2014

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

Treasurer

Sample of Legal Cases

Uncommon v. GoDirect

settled favorably

Trover Group v. Logitech

settled favorably

Brady v. Von Drehle Corp.

settled

Inter partes reviews

achieved stay of litigation and discouraged additional litigation

Mass Engineered Design v. Planar Systems

pending

Olivistar v. Logitech

settled favorably

InvenSense v. STMicroelectronics

settled favorably

STMicroelectronics v InvenSense

settled favorably

Multiple patent reexaminations

achieved stay of litigation

ITC Investigation No. 337-TA-841

judgment of noninfringement after trial

Charge Lion v. Semtech

dismissed by plaintiff

Fernandez v. Adobe Systems

stayed

Hopewell Culture & Design v Archos et al.

settled favorably

San Francisco Technology, Inc. v. Howell Ventures Ltd.

Complaint dismissed after favorable settlement

Apple Inc. v. Sanho Corp.

Permanent Injunction against future infringement

Mezzalingua v. Global Sourcing Solutions et al.

resolved favorably

Textscape LLC v. Adobe Systems Inc.

Summary judgment of patent invalidity

Honeywell International v. Acer America et al.

summary judgment of noninfringement

E-Pass Technologies Inc. v. palmOne et al.

Summary judgment of noninfringement and award of attorneys' fees

See More Legal Cases

Education

2000

University of Virginia School of Law

Juris Doctor

1996

University of Arizona

Bachelor of Science

Speaking Engagements

2016

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

Intellectual Property Year in Review

2015

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

Current Issues of Import for Intellectual Property Practitioners

2014

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

The Year in Review and in Preview: Key Intellectual Property Rulings and Expected Decisions

2011

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

Unringing the Bell: Golan v. Holder and the Privatization of the Public Domain (subject: copyright)

2010

San Francisco Bay Area Intellectual Property American Inn of Court

"The Best Defense is a Joint Defense - or is it" - presenter and panelist regarding best practices related to joint defense agreements

2010

Law Seminars International Telebriefing False Patent Marking in the Wake of the Forest Group Decision

2010

Continuing Legal Education

False Patent Marking after Forest Group v. Bon Tool: state of the law, marking tips, and litigation strategies

2008

ACC Speaking Series

Vanquishing the Patent Troll

Publications

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution