Jonathan Marcos Kaplan

Jonathan Marcos Kaplan

5.0
Rating: 8.5

Licensed for 24 years

Intellectual property Lawyer at Scotts Valley, CA
Practice Areas: Intellectual Property, Patent Application, Life Sciences & Biotechnology, Patent Infringement

PO Box 66744, Scotts Valley, CA

About Jonathan

Biography

Practice Areas

4

Practice Areas

Intellectual Property 30%

Patent Landscapes: I identify third party patents and applications that are relevant to my clients’ businesses and technologies. I provide my view of claim scope and the likelihood of relevant claims issuing from pending applications. Opinions: I provide patent enforceability, validity, and infringement opinions. The opinions might be rendered for early innovation guidance, generic or follow-on product development, due diligence, or defenses against willful infringement allegations.

25 years

30%
Life Sciences and Biotechnology 30%

I leverage my Ph.D. in Microbiology and experience as in-house counsel at two biotechnology companies to provide full service to life science clients of all sizes. I manage patent portfolios and invention disclosures. I clear publication requests, and identify licensing opportunities. I also help with material transfer agreements and non-disclosure agreements.

25 years

30%
Patent Application 30%

I provide U.S. patent prosecution services and direct the prosecution of foreign applications. I help my clients manage their patent portfolios. I help with application appeals and other post-grant proceedings.

25 years

30%
Patent Infringement 10%

Litigation Support: Patent litigation is complex. Having served as patent litigation counsel for years at major law firms, I now work with litigation counsel to protect my clients’ interests. I participate in litigation strategy, review work product, and liaise between my clients and litigation counsel. I helps with internal investigations, document retention policies, and document collection. I also help with settlement negotiations.

25 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Free Consultation

$0 first 30 minutes

Hourly Rates

$ 400-400 per hour

Retainer

Always


Payment Methods

  • Cash
  • Check

Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Licensed in New York for 24 years

State: New York

Acquired: 2002

Currently Registered

No misconduct found

Location

Kaplan IP Law

PO Box 66744, Scotts Valley, CA, 95067

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Jonathan Marcos Kaplan's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

5.0 /5.0

4 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (4) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 4
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 0
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 1 of 1 review | General Knowledge

Posted by Tarik | July 26, 2012 | Intellectual Property

Knowledgeable

I am a founder at a startup biotech in Cambridge. I needed help with securing the intellectual property that is the core of the company. I found Jon to be extremely helpful in crafting a terrific application. His experience really came through on a few points. I found him to be very quick at identify...ing issues and coming up with the right framework to put a very compelling application together. He did not waste any time as discussions were to the point and drafting time was very reasonable. I would certainly use him for future IP work.

See All Client Reviews

Jonathan Marcos Kaplan's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Jonathan
Robert Joseph Chambers II headshot
Robert Chambers

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 20

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"John is attentive, thorough, and incredibly knowledgeable about intellectual property issues. I would not hesitate to work with him again."

Craig McClellan headshot
Craig McClellan

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 16

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"John is a skilled and careful intellectual property attorney, and a team player. He is responsive, shows great initiative and is a pleasure to work with."

Michael G Schachter headshot
Michael Schachter

Intellectual property lawyer | Feb 05

Relationship: Worked together on matter

"Jonathan is an excellent attorney! I refer my clients to him for all of my patent and intellectual property matters."

View All Endorsements
Robert Joseph Chambers II headshot
Robert Chambers

Business lawyer

Craig McClellan headshot
Craig McClellan

Business lawyer

Michael G Schachter headshot
Michael Schachter

Business lawyer

Michael A. Valek headshot
Michael Valek

Patent infringement lawyer

Jane E. Remillard headshot
Jane Remillard

Patent application lawyer

Tracey B. Davies headshot
Tracey Davies

Patent infringement lawyer

Experience

Rating:  8.5 (Excellent)

Work Experience

2011 - Present

Principal, Kaplan IP Law

2010 - 2011

Director of Intellectual Property, Genencor

2007 - 2010

Intellectual Property Counsel, Medarex, Inc.

2003 - 2007

Associate, Morrison & Foerster

2002 - 2003

Associate, Fish & Neave

1997 - 2002

Patent Agent, Fish & Neave

Associations

2002 - Present

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Patent Attorney

2011 - 2014

BayBio

Member to Member Service Provider

2010 - 2012

Intellectual Property Owners Association

Member

2000 - 2002

United States Patent and Trademark Office

Patent Agent

Sample of Legal Cases

Perlan Therapeutics, Inc. v. NexBio, Inc.

Settled

Biogen v. Berlex

Favorable settlement after appeal to the Federal Circuit.

Housey v. AstraZeneca et al.

Patents successfully found invalid and unenforceable.

Ecast v. TouchTunes and Rowe Int'l

Settlement on the eve of trial

Regents of the University of California v. Monsanto

Favorable settlement for the University of California.

Novozymes v. Danisco US

Patent held invalid for lack of written description.

Patent Preparation and Prosecution

Patents issued and prosecution ongoing

Patent Opinions, Landscapes, and Due Diligence

Third party IP reviewed, and when requested, opinions rendered.

See More Legal Cases

Education

2001

Fordham University School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

1997

Columbia University

PhD - Doctorate

1991

California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo

undergraduate

Speaking Engagements

2013

Licensing Executives Society

Biofuel Patent Strategies

Publications

2002

Nature Biotechnology 20:945-947 Flattmann and Kaplan, Licensing Research Tool Patents

2001

Nature Biotechnology 19:683-684 Flattmann and Kaplan, Patenting Expressed Sequence Tags and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (Part 1)

2001

Nature Biotechnology 19:777-779 Flattmann and Kaplan, Patenting Expressed Sequence Tags and Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (Part 2)

1997

Nucleic Acids Research 25:1108-1116 Kaplan & Calame, The ZiN/POZ Domain of ZF5 is Required for Both Transcriptional Activation and Repression

1993

Nucleic Acids Research 21:3767-3775 Numoto et al., Transcriptional Repressor ZF5 Identifies a New Conserved Domain in Zinc Finger Proteins

Languages

English

Activity

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution