No Photo

David Henry Sussman

Licensed for 49 years

Family Lawyer at Campbell, CA
Practice Areas: Family

51 E Campbell Ave Ste 400 X, Campbell, CA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
See Details
Claim Profile

Is this your profile? Claiming it is free and only takes 2 minutes.

About David

Practice Areas

1

Practice Area

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 49 years

State: California

Acquired: 1976

Not Eligible to Practice Law (Not Entitled)

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2024

Location

Law Ofc David H Sussman

51 E Campbell Ave Ste 400 X, Campbell, CA, 95008-2989

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

David Henry Sussman's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

3.0 /5.0

2 Client Reviews

Filter Avvo Reviews (2) Refine reviews to match your needs. Use the filters to quickly surface reviews that align with your case or priorities.
Star rating
5 stars 1
4 stars 0
3 stars 0
2 stars 0
1 star 1
Practice Areas

Showing 1 - 2 of 2 reviews

Posted by Loretta | June 28, 2016 | Hired Attorney | Family

Aggressive and Sharp as a Knife

Mr. Sussman settled my support case that my previous attorney botched. He did it fast and got me the best results imaginable. It was painless because of him. Yes, he does come off as agressive, even to his clients, and will not sugar coat anything, but he knows what he's doing so you kind of have to ...let him do his thing. If you want your case to be resolved, put on a thick skin, let Mr. Sussman take you through the process (F bombs and all) and enjoy the ride. He is actually very funny and has some great stories (that he will not bill you for his time for). Overall, the best attorney I have ever dealt with!

Posted by EhlersD | May 24, 2015 | Lawsuits & Disputes

I wish I never met this man, let alone pay him to represent me.

He admitted to making several very poor decisions in his lifetime, but had the audacity to point fingers and condescend me repeatedly, his paying client. I thought I should endure his treatment however. If he was this harsh with me in his office and on the phone, he would be a "Jackie Chiles" in cour...t right? I was wrong... He was recommended by another attorney who described David as a bull dog. But this description failed in court where he became a sheep for the court but always guileful wolf towards me. In court, he exchanged pleasantries with opposing counsel and to my shock, discussed how he knew opposing counsel's client from a restaurant that he frequents. About the billing...he charged me 4 hours of "research" for something I found the answer to in minutes using google. He emailed me once at 3am Sunday morning, making me wonder if he was charging me for his "work" after he had been enjoying his Saturday night. In that email, he was requesting paperwork and asking questions that were blatantly clear and obvious. He was asking questions that we had already discussed. He was asking for papers that he already had in file. Obviously his brain could not be functioning properly at 3 am Sunday morning. But even during normal, diurnal hours, David would waste my time with stories. He would tell me that he was not charging his time for these stories when in reality, the bills show that he ran the clock during his story-telling times that had nothing to do with my case. In fact, sometimes he would REPEAT these stories, and if I tried to interrupt him he would raise his voice as if not to be interrupted. I am pretty sure he would meet criteria for narcissistic personality disorder. When he wanted to be hired, he and his assistant claimed that they knew the judge personally and that David had helped this judge with election. They created an image that David was the one to hire because of this particular judge, and that it would be advantageous for me. Then in court, David tried to exchange pleasantries with the judge and was shut down cold. The judge did not even acknowledge his existence. It made me again question what David presented in order to be hired. Liar... David promised to present evidence on my behalf with a strong case, but then at court, all he did was acquiesce. Then in order to get me to agree, he said that he would charge me a lot more for a trial and literally walked away from me at court saying "You don't listen" when I was asking why he was abandoning everything we discussed in preparation. On court day, he charged me a full extra hour more than the time we were actually in court. It seems he charged me for the time it took him to stroll from his office to court and back. In totality, he fluffed all of his billing to charge more hours. With his "experience" and "expertise", one would assume he get his work done in less time. As an educated person without a law degree, I always researched our discussions myself and found the answers quickly. His "research" should not have even amounted to one hour, but he charged more than 4!

See All Client Reviews

David Henry Sussman's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse David

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024.

Public reproval with/duties issued in CA, 2024

updated on 01/30/2024

A censure or reprimand issued by the Supreme Court or the State Bar Court that is not a matter of public record unless imposed after the initiation of formal disciplinary proceedings. No period of suspension is imposed. The reproval may be imposed with duties or conditions.

Education

N/A

Boston University School of Law

N/A

Santa Clara University School of Law

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2024
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution