We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
also known as Christopher Elliott Skinnell, Chris Skinnell
Chris Skinnell is a partner practicing law and civil litigation relating to elections, state and local initiative and referenda, redistricting and voting rights, property rights/rent control, campaign finance, tribal gaming, and general constitutional and government law issues. He advises clients and litigates on a broad range of election, government, and political law related matters, including serving as the firm’s lead partner on conflict-of-interest issues. He also serves as the firm’s General Counsel.
Mr. Skinnell has considerable expertise in redistricting and voting rights. He has advised scores of counties, cities, school districts and special districts on compliance with state and federal laws governing redistricting; has counseled many additional public entity clients regarding the requirements of the federal Voting Rights Act and the California Voting Rights Act; has represented public entity defendants in several leading CVRA cases; and has represented amici curiae in several leading voting rights and redistricting cases before the United States Supreme Court.
Mr. Skinnell has also litigated a number of constitutional issues related to campaign finance regulations, property rights, the use of public funds in connection with ballot measure campaigns, and the legality of various electoral systems.
He has also served as counsel to a number of ballot measure committees, independent expenditure committees, and political action committees.
Mr. Skinnell is a member of the Board of Governors of the Rose Institute of State & Local Government at Claremont McKenna College.
From 2019 to 2025, Mr. Skinnell was selected as a Northern California Super Lawyer, and he was the subject of a feature article in the 2020 edition of Super Lawyer magazine entitled “The Electioneer.” He had previously been named a Rising Star five times, from 2013-2017. Only the top 5 percent of all attorneys in California are named as Super Lawyers. They are selected through peer nominations and evaluations along with third-party research.
Sacramento magazine selected Mr. Skinnell for inclusion in its list of Top Lawyers of 2015, and Sonoma Magazine selected Mr. Skinnell for inclusion in its "Lawyers of Distinction" feature in 2021 and 2022.
Prior to joining the firm, Mr. Skinnell worked as a political consultant to several California legislative and initiative campaigns; as a research associate at the Rose Institute; and as the chairman of a successful initiative campaign in Southern California.
6
Practice Areas
23 years | 42 cases
23 years | 84 cases
23 years | 40 cases
23 years | 200 cases
We have not found any cost information for this lawyer
Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.
Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.
Chat withState: California
Acquired: 2003
No misconduct found
2350 Kerner Boulevard, Suite 250, San Rafael, CA, 94901
1415 L Street, Suite 1200, Sacramento, CA, 95814
Not Yet Reviewed
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.
2025
Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers
2024
Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers
2023
Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers
2022
Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers
2022
Lawyers of Distinction, Sonoma Magazine
2021
Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers
2021
Lawyers of Distinction, Sonoma Magazine
2020
Subject of Feature Article, "The Electioneer", Northern California Super Lawyers
2019
Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers
2017
Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers
2016
Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers
2015
Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers
2015
Top Lawyers of 2015, Sacramento Magazine
2014
Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers
2013
Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers
2013 - Present
Partner, NIELSEN MERKSAMER, LLP
2003 - 2012
Associate, NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO GROSS & LEONI, LLP
2002 - 2003
Editor-in-Chief, University of Chicago Legal Forum
2002 - 2002
Summer Associate, NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR, LLP
2001 - 2001
Summer Associate, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC
1995 - 2000
Research Associate, Rose Institute of State & Local Government
2016 - Present
Rose Institute of State & Local GovernmentMember, Board of Governors
2003 - Present
California Political Attorneys AssociationMember
Petition for Writ of Mandate Granted
Judgment in favor of Respondent denying writ of mandate
Resolved by entry of stipulated judgment
After TRO denied, action dismissed as moot
Judgment in favor of defendant reversed with instructions to grant judgment to plaintiffs
Trial court judgment reversed and remanded
Trial court decision affirmed; Ellis Act held to preempt ordinance
Trial court judgment reversed and remanded on other grounds
Appeals court affirmed judgment in favor of client
Judgment in client's favor
Motion to Dismiss granted with prejudice (appeal pending, 9th Cir. No. 16-55758)
Obtained stipulated judgment striking all challenged statements
The Court affirmed the position advocated for--that congressional redistricting by independent commission is constitutional
Order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend affirmed in full
Trial court rejected all efforts to change ballot arguments, and ordered minor, technical changes to ballot label
Court entered judgment ordering substantial revisions to ballot label and "impartial" analysis
Summary judgment granted to defendants and interveners, and affirmed
The County's brief supported neither party, but the Court held that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional; its formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdictions to preclearance
Case dismissed with prejudice
Judgment granted in favor of plaintiff; petition for writ of mandate denied
Following the award of a preliminary injunction, the City’s ordinance was amended to remove the offending provisions
Stipulated bailout judgment awarded in favor of Merced County
Denial of preliminary injunction affirmed as a matter of law; judgment subsequently granted to defendants and interveners
Judgment granted in favor of plaintiffs
summary judgment granted for Merced County in 2008
preliminary injunction affirmed; judgment subsequently entered in plaintiffs' favor
Case dismissed with prejudice
Writ of Mandate granted
2003
JD - Juris Doctor
1999
B.A., magna cum laude
2025
2024
2021
Legal Requirements & Technical Aspects of Redistricting in 2021
2020
Local Redistricting Criteria: New Rules of the Road for 2021
2020
2020
2020
2021 Redistricting – What County Counsel Needs to Know
2020
2019
Presentation, Census 2020 and Redistricting
2019
2019
2019
2019
2019
2015
2015
2015
2014
2013
The Supreme Court’s Shelby County & the Future of Voting Rights Enforcement
2013
Voting Rights in California
2012
Pay-to-Play: Here to Stay? A Discussion of a Recent Litigation Concerning Play-to-Play Rules, and Related Issues
2011
2011
2011
Redistricting – Court Challenges & Legal Issues
2011
2011
2009
2009
The Effect of Vargas v. City of Salinas on the Use of Public Funds in Ballot Measure Campaigns
2009
2009
The Voting Rights Act and the Next Redistricting Cycle
2009
2008
2007
Update on Political Law and Related Developments
2005
Congressional Renewal of Sections 5 & 203 of the Voting Rights Act
2003
California Voting Rights Act (with Marguerite Mary Leoni)
2023
2021
2021
2015
2013
2013
2012
2009
2009
2008
2006
2006
2005
2005
2003
2003
2002
2000
English