Christophe Elliott Skinnell

Christophe Elliott Skinnell

also known as Christopher Elliott Skinnell, Chris Skinnell

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 22 years

Election campaigns and political law Lawyer at San Rafael, CA
Practice Areas: Election Campaigns & Political Law, Litigation, State, Local And Municipal Law ... +3 more

2350 Kerner Boulevard, Suite 250, San Rafael, CA

About Christophe

Biography

Practice Areas

6

Practice Areas

Litigation 35%

23 years | 84 cases

35%
Constitutional 10%

23 years | 40 cases

10%
State, Local, and Municipal Law 10%

23 years | 200 cases

10%
Government 5%

23 years | 40 cases

5%

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 22 years

State: California

Acquired: 2003

Active

No misconduct found

Location

Nielsen Merksamer, LLP

2350 Kerner Boulevard, Suite 250, San Rafael, CA, 94901

Nielsen Merksamer, LLP

1415 L Street, Suite 1200, Sacramento, CA, 95814

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Christophe Elliott Skinnell's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Christophe Elliott Skinnell's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Christophe

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2025

Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers

2024

Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers

2023

Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers

2022

Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers

2022

Lawyers of Distinction, Sonoma Magazine

2021

Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers

2021

Lawyers of Distinction, Sonoma Magazine

2020

Subject of Feature Article, "The Electioneer", Northern California Super Lawyers

2019

Super Lawyer, Northern California Super Lawyers

2017

Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers

2016

Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers

2015

Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers

2015

Top Lawyers of 2015, Sacramento Magazine

2014

Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers

2013

Rising Star, Northern California Super Lawyers

Work Experience

2013 - Present

Partner, NIELSEN MERKSAMER, LLP

2003 - 2012

Associate, NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO GROSS & LEONI, LLP

2002 - 2003

Editor-in-Chief, University of Chicago Legal Forum

2002 - 2002

Summer Associate, NIELSEN MERKSAMER PARRINELLO MUELLER & NAYLOR, LLP

2001 - 2001

Summer Associate, Cooper & Kirk, PLLC

1995 - 2000

Research Associate, Rose Institute of State & Local Government

Associations

2016 - Present

Rose Institute of State & Local Government

Member, Board of Governors

2003 - Present

California Political Attorneys Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

California Apartment Association v. County of Los Angeles, Case No. 23STCP01114 (Los Angeles County Superior Court)

Petition for Writ of Mandate Granted

Chang v. Glasco, Arcadia City Clerk, et al., Case No. 22STCP01633 (Los Angeles County Superior Court)

Judgment in favor of Respondent denying writ of mandate

Tate, et al. v. City of Morgan Hill, et al., Case No. 22CV396857 (Santa Clara County Superior Court)

Resolved by entry of stipulated judgment

Fugazi v. Padilla, Case No. 2:20-cv-00970-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal. filed May 12, 2020)

After TRO denied, action dismissed as moot

Tesoro Logistics Operations, LLC v. City of Rialto, 40 Cal. App. 5th 798 (2019), rev. den., 2020 Cal. LEXIS 266 (Cal. 2020)

Judgment in favor of defendant reversed with instructions to grant judgment to plaintiffs

200 Arguello Associates, LLC v. Dyas, Case No. A145533, 2017 Cal. App. Unpub. LEXIS 3295 (1st Dist., Div. 2, May 12, 2017)

Trial court judgment reversed and remanded

Coyne v. City & County of San Francisco, 9 Cal. App. 5th 1215 (Cal. Ct. App. 1st Dist. 2016)

Trial court decision affirmed; Ellis Act held to preempt ordinance

Bethune-Hill v. Va. State Bd. of Elections, 580 U.S. __, 137 S. Ct. 788, 197 L. Ed. 2d 85 (2017)

Trial court judgment reversed and remanded on other grounds

San Francisco Apartment Assn. v. City & County of San Francisco, 3 Cal. App. 5th 463 (1st Dist., Div. 3, 2016)

Appeals court affirmed judgment in favor of client

James, et al. v. Schmidt, et al., Case No. 16CV299134 (Santa Clara County Superior Court)

Judgment in client's favor

Soltysik v. Padilla, Case No. 2:15-cv-07916-AB-GJSx (C.D. Cal. 2016)

Motion to Dismiss granted with prejudice (appeal pending, 9th Cir. No. 16-55758)

King v. Dupuis, Case No. RG16809407 (Alameda Superior Court)

Obtained stipulated judgment striking all challenged statements

Ariz. State Legislature v. Ariz. Independent Redistricting Comm'n, 576 U.S. __, 135 S. Ct. 2652, 192 L. Ed. 2d 704 (2015)

The Court affirmed the position advocated for--that congressional redistricting by independent commission is constitutional

Rubin v. Padilla, 233 Cal. App. 4th 1128 (1st Dist. 2015), cert. denied, 577 U.S. __ (Oct. 13, 2015)

Order sustaining demurrer without leave to amend affirmed in full

La Habra Heights Oil Watch, et al. v. Clark, Case No. BS152800 (Los Angeles Superior Court)

Trial court rejected all efforts to change ballot arguments, and ordered minor, technical changes to ballot label

Johnson v. Numainville, Case No. RG14736763 (Alameda County Superior Court)

Court entered judgment ordering substantial revisions to ballot label and "impartial" analysis

Chamness v. Bowen, 722 F.3d 1110 (9th Cir. 2013)

Summary judgment granted to defendants and interveners, and affirmed

Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder, Case No. 12-96, 570 U.S. __ (2013)

The County's brief supported neither party, but the Court held that Section 4 of the Voting Rights Act is unconstitutional; its formula can no longer be used as a basis for subjecting jurisdictions to preclearance

Brown v. Bowen, Case No. 12-cv-05547-PA-SP (C.D. Cal.)

Case dismissed with prejudice

Gutierrez v. Superior Court, Case No. B243738 (Cal. Ct. App. 2d Dist., Div. 2, 2012)

Judgment granted in favor of plaintiff; petition for writ of mandate denied

Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes v. City of Richmond, Case No. 3:12-cv-04545-CRB (N.D. Cal.)

Following the award of a preliminary injunction, the City’s ordinance was amended to remove the offending provisions

Merced County, Cal. v. Holder, Case No. 1:12-cv-00354-TFH-DST-ABJ (D.D.C.) (three-judge § 5 court)

Stipulated bailout judgment awarded in favor of Merced County

Field v. Bowen, 196 Cal. App. 4th 346 (1st Dist. 2011)

Denial of preliminary injunction affirmed as a matter of law; judgment subsequently granted to defendants and interveners

Larson v. City & County of San Francisco, 192 Cal. App. 4th 1263 (2011)

Judgment granted in favor of plaintiffs

Lopez v. Merced County, 473 F. Supp. 2d 1072 (E.D. Cal. 2007)

summary judgment granted for Merced County in 2008

Citizens to Save California, et al. v. Cal. Fair Pol. Practices Comm'n, 145 Cal. App. 4th 736 (3d Dist. 2006)

preliminary injunction affirmed; judgment subsequently entered in plaintiffs' favor

Yes on 87-Californians for Clean Energy v. Californians Against Higher Taxes–No on 87, Case 06AS03895 (Sacramento Super. Ct.)

Case dismissed with prejudice

Honda v. Smith, Case No. 05-CV-047535 (Santa Clara County Super. Ct.)

Writ of Mandate granted

See More Legal Cases

Education

2003

University of Chicago Law School

JD - Juris Doctor

1999

Claremont McKenna College

B.A., magna cum laude

Speaking Engagements

2025

California League of Cities Annual Conference California Voting Rights Act: Developments, Compliance, and Litigation

2021

2021 Redistricting Webinars - Rural County Representatives of California & California State Assn of Counties

Legal Requirements & Technical Aspects of Redistricting in 2021

2020

Rose Institute of State and Local Government: 2021 Redistricting - New Rules for California Local Governments

Local Redistricting Criteria: New Rules of the Road for 2021

2020

Municipal Law Institute Redistricting After 2020 Census

2020

Meeting & Roundtable of County Counsel Legal Advisors to County Elections Officials 2020-2021 California Redistricting: A Legal and Legislative Update

2020

CLE Brown Bag Webinar - County Counsels' Association of California

2021 Redistricting – What County Counsel Needs to Know

2020

California League of Cities, City Clerks New Law & Elections Seminar 2021 Redistricting is Here—and the Rules Have Changed Again

2019

State Law Resources Group - Fall Meeting

Presentation, Census 2020 and Redistricting

2019

Rose Institute of State & Local Government - Online Webinar Local Redistricting in California in 2021: The Same… But Different

2019

Rose Institute of State & Local Government - Online Webinar The California Voting Rights Act: A Revolution in Local Governance

2019

Panelist, Annual Meeting, Am. Bar Assn. Young Lawyers Div. “Partisan Gerrymandering: 2019 Update”

2019

League of Cal. Cities - City Clerks New Law & Elections Seminar Presentation, "Redistricting 101 for Municipalities"

2019

Alameda County Bar Association - Real Estate Panel on COPA/TOPA San Francisco's Community Opportunity to Purchase Act (COPA)

2015

2015

Marian Miner Cook Athenaeum/Claremont McKenna College "Taking Voter Equality Seriously: What Does 'One-Person, One-Vote' Really Mean?"

2014

Council on Governmental Ethics Laws (COGEL) - 36th Annual Conference Campaign Finance Update I: The “Must Know” Litigation of 2014

2013

Webinar, Practising Law Institute

The Supreme Court’s Shelby County & the Future of Voting Rights Enforcement

2013

Webinar

Voting Rights in California

2012

California Political Attorneys Association 2012 Annual Conference

Pay-to-Play: Here to Stay? A Discussion of a Recent Litigation Concerning Play-to-Play Rules, and Related Issues

2011

Redistricting Essentials: 2011 Redistricting and Local/Special Districts Redistricting/Voting Rights

2011

Northern California RedistrictingCA Conference Commuter Flight: Participating in Local Redistricting

2011

Council on Governmental Ethics Laws - 2011 Annual Conference

Redistricting – Court Challenges & Legal Issues

2011

CACEO Annual Conference: Redistricting Seminar Section 203 of the Federal Voting Rights Act

2011

CACEO Annual Conference: Redistricting Seminar Redistricting Litigation: State & Local

2009

Redistricting, The 2010 Census, and Your Budget: Changes & Challenges for California Governments The California Voting Rights Act: Developing Jurisprudence

2009

California Political Attorneys Association 2009 Annual Conference

The Effect of Vargas v. City of Salinas on the Use of Public Funds in Ballot Measure Campaigns

2009

Annual 2009 Education Conference & Trade Show The California Voting Rights Act: Developing Jurisprudence

2009

2009 Fall Forum & Meeting of the Standing Committees

The Voting Rights Act and the Next Redistricting Cycle

2009

2009 City Clerks New Law & Leadership Conference The California Voting Rights Act: Developing Jurisprudence

2008

National Business Institute - Teleconference Voting Rights: Claims, Redistricting & More

2007

California Political Attorneys Association 2007 Annual Conference

Update on Political Law and Related Developments

2005

Annual Conference, California State Assn of Counties

Congressional Renewal of Sections 5 & 203 of the Voting Rights Act

2003

City Attorneys Annual Conference, League of California Cities

California Voting Rights Act (with Marguerite Mary Leoni)

Publications

2015

Los Angeles Daily Journal Victory for California Voters, Too

2012

America Votes! A Guide to Modern Election Law and Voting Rights (ABA, 2d ed.) Chapter 12: The California Voting Rights Act (with Marguerite Mary Leoni)

2009

2009

2008

National Business Institute Seminar Voting Rights: Claims, Redistricting & More

2006

Gross, Nielsen & Baran (eds), Corp. Pol. Activities: Complying With Campaign Finance, Lobbying & Ethics Laws (Practising Law Inst.) “Overview of Federal Campaign Finance Rules” (with Chip Nielsen & Jason Kaune)

2006

CA County Magazine Cover Story, Congress Considers Renewal of Two Key Sections of the Federal Voting Rights Act: California Elections Could See Dramatic Impacts (with Marguerite Mary Leoni)

2005

Gross, Nielsen & Baran (eds), Corp. Pol. Activities: Complying With Campaign Finance, Lobbying & Ethics Laws (Practising Law Inst.) “Membership Organizations: Corporations Without Capital Stock” (with Chip Nielsen & Jason Kaune)

2005

Gross, Nielsen & Baran (eds), Corp. Pol. Activities: Complying With Campaign Finance, Lobbying & Ethics Laws (Practising Law Inst.) “Overview of Federal Campaign Finance Rules” (with Chip Nielsen & Jason Kaune)

2003

City Attorneys Annual Conference Papers (League of Cal. Cities) “The California Voting Rights Act” (with Marguerite M. Leoni)

2003

2000

Rose Institute of State & Local Government The Political Consequences of Redistricting: Three Scenarios in 2001

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution