Lindsay Elizabeth Nako

Lindsay Elizabeth Nako

also known as Lindsay Polastri Nako

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 10.0

Licensed for 20 years

Employment and labor Lawyer at Berkeley, CA
Practice Areas: Employment & Labor, Class Action

125 University Ave., Ste. 102, Berkeley, CA

About Lindsay

Biography

Practice Areas

Fees and Rates

We have not found any cost information for this lawyer


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 20 years

State: California

Acquired: 2005

Active

No misconduct found

Location

The Impact Fund

125 University Ave., Ste. 102, Berkeley, CA, 94710

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Lindsay Elizabeth Nako's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Lindsay Elizabeth Nako's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Lindsay

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  10.0 (Superb)

Honors

2015

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

2014

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

2013

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

2012

Attorney Award, East Bay Community Law Center

2012

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

2011

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

2010

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

2009

Northern California Super Lawyers – Rising Star, Law & Politics Magazine

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Special Counsel, The Impact Fund

2012 - 2015

Shareholder, Lewis, Feinberg, Lee & Jackson, P.C.

2005 - 2005

Judicial Extern to the Honorable Claudia Wilken, United States District Court, Northern District of California

2005 - 2012

Associate Attorney, Lewis, Feinberg, Lee, Renaker & Jackson, P.C.

2004 - 2004

Law Clerk, Equal Rights Advocates

2004 - 2004

Law Clerk, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission

Associations

2005 - Present

State Bar of California

Active Member

National Employment Lawyers Association

Member

Asian American Bar Association of the Greater Bay Area

Member

2013 - 2015

American Bar Association Labor & Employment Law, Employee Benefits Committee

Plaintiff Co-Chair, Preemption Subcommittee

2010 - 2011

American Bar Association Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Section

Vice Chair

2009 - 2013

American Bar Association Labor & Employment Law, Employee Benefits Committee

Plaintiff Co-Chair, Reporting & Disclosure Subcommittee

Sample of Legal Cases

Rosenburg, et al., v. IBM

$65 million settlement

Shore v. International Painters & Allied Trades Industry Pension Plan

Win for plaintiff

Ellis, et al., v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

$8 million settlement

Beeson, et al., v. Fireman’s Fund Insurance Co.

$36.8 million verdict for plaintiffs

See More Legal Cases

Education

2005

University of California at Berkeley, Boalt Hall School of Law

JD - Juris Doctor

2002

University of California Berkeley

BA - Bachelor of Arts

Speaking Engagements

2013

Shaking the Foundations Conference, Stanford Law School

Battling Goliath: The Impact of For-Profit Plaintiff-Side Litigation Against Corporate Defendants

2013

Midwinter Meeting of the American Bar Association – Employee Benefits Committee

Remedies After Amara

2013

ABA ERISA Litigation National Institute, Long-Term Disability Benefits Advanced Seminar

Administrative Appeals of Long-Term Disability Claims

2013

ABA ERISA Litigation National Institute

ERISA Remedies from Amara to McCutchen

2012

Midwinter Meeting of the American Bar Association – Employee Benefits Committee

Benefits Claims Update: Standard of Review, Discovery & Attorneys’ Fees: Where Are We After Glenn, Frommert & Hardt?

2012

Annual ERISA Litigation Conference

The Amara Case, Misrepresentation Claims, & Remedies

2011

Labor & Employment Law Annual Conference

A Class Action Just Walked in the Door – EEO Class Case Management 101

2011

ALRP CLE Panel Series

Pre-Litigation Strategies for Health and Disability ERISA Claims

2010

National Employment Lawyers Association Annual Convention

New Trends: Using Expert Witnesses in Employment Litigation

2010

Midwinter Meeting of the American Bar Association – Employee Benefits Committee

ERISA Preemption: Golden Gate Restaurant Assoc. v. City & County of San Francisco

2009

ALRP CLE Panel Series

Employment Law Update

2008

ABA Labor & Employment Law Annual Conference

Non-Statutory Claims and Other Common Law Employment Issues

Publications

2012

ABA Labor and Employment Law Section, Employee Benefits Committee Newsletter Surcharge: The Resurgence of a Monetary Equitable Remedy
Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution