Clayton William Kent

Clayton William Kent

0.0
Not yet reviewed Write a Review
Rating: 6.0

Licensed for 39 years

Personal injury Lawyer at Napa, CA
Practice Areas: Personal Injury, Construction & Development, Wrongful Death ... +2 more

575 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 205, Napa, CA

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2018
See Details

About Clayton

Biography

Practice Areas

5

Practice Areas

Personal Injury 35%

Mortuary Malpractice; Toxic Torts; Automobile Accidents; Elder Abuse

40 years

35%
Construction and Development 30%

Construction Defect; Breach of Construction Contracts; Architect Malpractice

40 years

30%
Business 10%

40 years

10%

Fees and Rates

Cost

Hourly Rates

$ 400-450 per hour

Contingency

33%-40%


Looking for an attorney? Avvo can help.

search module image

Search our directory

Quickly connect with top attorneys through our legal directory to get help with your legal issue.

chat module image

Avvo's live chat agents can help coordinate a consultation with a local attorney.

Chat with a live agent who can match you with the right attorney for your legal needs.

Chat with

Licenses

Licensed in California for 39 years

State: California

Acquired: 1986

Active

Lawyer disciplined by state licensing authority in 2018

Location

Kent Law

575 Lincoln Avenue, Suite 205, Napa, CA, 94558

Ad

Transform legal challenges into solutions.

Connect now to review your situation.

The Avvo Rating explained

display-bg

The Avvo Rating explained

Clayton William Kent's Reviews

Avvo Review Score

0.0 /5.0

Not Yet Reviewed

Clayton William Kent's Lawyer Endorsements

Endorse Clayton

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't received any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

No Endorsement Data Available Yet
This attorney hasn't created any attorney endorsements recently on Avvo.

Experience

Rating:  6.0 (Good)

Professional misconduct

This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2018.

Discipline with Actual Suspension issued in CA, 2018

updated on 01/16/2019

This sanction means the attorney lost his or her license to practice law for a period of time. The attorney typically returns to practicing law when the suspension expires.

Honors

2006

Certificate of Recognition, California State Assembly

2006

Outstanding Dedication, Legal Aid of Marin

2005

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

2004

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

2003

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

2002

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

2001

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

2000

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

1999

Wiley Manuel Pro Bono Award, State Bar of California, Board of Governors

Work Experience

2015 - Present

Owner, Kent Law

2012 - 2015

Partner, Gravett <> Kent LLP

1995 - 2012

Senior Litigation Attorney, Brayton Purcell, LLP

1991 - 1995

Owner, Law Offices of Clayton W. Kent

1989 - 1991

Partner, Crawford, Bangs, Briesemeister & Kent

1986 - 1989

Associate, Crawford & Bangs

Associations

1997 - Present

Consumer Attorneys of Marin

Past President, Member

1997 - Present

Consumer Attorneys of California

Member

1997 - Present

Napa County Bar Association

Member

Sample of Legal Cases

King v. Chandler

Verdict and Judgment for King

Cannon et al. v. Funerals by Washington, et al.

Judgment: $9,000,000.00

John Doe v. Sonoma County, et al.

Judgment: $3,500,000.00

Harrell v. Virtual Escrow, Inc., et al.

Judgment: $860,000.00

Goldberg v. Sunhill Corporation, et al.

Verdict: $50,000.00

Leach v. E.F. Boyd & Sons

Ohio Jury Verdict: $750,000.00

Hansen v. Property Rentals Only, Inc., et al.

Judgment: $225,000.00

Vellenoweth v. Hendrix, et al.

Judgment: $5,500,000.00

Deang v. Rodriguez, et al.

Judgment: $155,000.00

Brewer v. Kite, et al.

Judgment: $34,155.00

Brown v. Morris

Judgment: $39,200.00

Carpenter v. McGee, et al.

Verdict:$35,000.00

See More Legal Cases

Education

1985

Southwestern Univ SOL

law

1982

California St Univ Long Beach

undergraduate

Languages

English

Avvo Rating

Our Rating is calculated using information the lawyer has included on their profile in addition to the information we collect from state bar associations and other organizations that license legal professionals. Attorneys who claim their profiles and provide Avvo with more information tend to have a higher rating than those who do not.

What determines Avvo Rating?
  • Experience & background Years licensed, work experience, education
  • Legal community recognition Peer endorsements, associations, awards
  • Legal thought leadership Publications, speaking engagements
  • Discipline
    This lawyer was disciplined by a state licensing authority in 2018
    Disciplinary information may not be comprehensive, or updated. We recommend that you always check a lawyer's disciplinary status with their respective state bar association before hiring them.
Avvo Rating Levels
10.0 - 9.0 Superb8.9 - 8.0 Excellent7.9 - 7.0 Very Good6.9 - 6.0 Good5.9 - 5.0 Average4.9 - 4.0 Concern3.9 - 3.0 Caution2.9 - 2.0 Strong Caution1.9 - 1.0 Extreme Caution